<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Mathew's comments - Latest Comments in Qtrax: How not to launch a product</title><link>http://mathewingram.disqus.com/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 03:25:38 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Qtrax: How not to launch a product</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/01/28/qtrax-how-not-to-launch-a-product/#comment-108133</link><description>If they can't legtitimize themselves, then yes. But still getting harder for most start-ups I talk to to rise above the noise lately...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">antje wilsch</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 03:25:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Qtrax: How not to launch a product</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/01/28/qtrax-how-not-to-launch-a-product/#comment-107984</link><description>You might be right, but I would argue that coming out with something that's&lt;br&gt;so obviously vapourware means there is something fundamentally wrong with&lt;br&gt;this company.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mathewi</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 02:21:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Qtrax: How not to launch a product</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/01/28/qtrax-how-not-to-launch-a-product/#comment-107976</link><description>eh, if they can come back with a good return, this will be forgotten about and they got a lot more press than they probably would have had with another boring "another start-up launches yay!" post ....  people's memories are short about stuff like this (again assuming they come back with grace).</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">antje wilsch</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 02:18:01 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>