<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Mathew's comments - Latest Comments in Publishers: Don&amp;#8217;t use crappy ad links</title><link>http://mathewingram.disqus.com/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 22:30:00 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Publishers: Don&amp;#8217;t use crappy ad links</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/10/01/publishers-dont-use-crappy-ad-links/#comment-2793205</link><description>Totally agree. However, we do use Amazon's context links, but with the settings tweaked so that it only links specific product names to a matching product on Amazon. In the past we'd manually link a book title; now the context links js handles it. Our readers don't seem to mind at all, but I'm sure they would if they started seeing links to bottom-feeding advertisers.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bluelines</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 22:30:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Publishers: Don&amp;#8217;t use crappy ad links</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/10/01/publishers-dont-use-crappy-ad-links/#comment-2788914</link><description>My mistake, David -- thanks for letting me know.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mathewi</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 18:54:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Publishers: Don&amp;#8217;t use crappy ad links</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/10/01/publishers-dont-use-crappy-ad-links/#comment-2788843</link><description>Correction -- I was long gone from &lt;a href="http://Forbes.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;Forbes.com&lt;/a&gt; when they experimented with IntelliTxt/Vibrant. Glad we agree.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">David Churbuck</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 18:49:40 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>