<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Mathew's comments - Latest Comments in Psystar wants to force Apple to open up</title><link>http://mathewingram.disqus.com/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 20:36:52 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Psystar wants to force Apple to open up</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/08/30/psystar-wants-to-force-apple-to-open-up/#comment-9262917</link><description>All I have to say is I am an owner of a Psystar Open Pro, it is always broken down and there is no support for it. There are some rude young people working there that think since I bought a cheap copy of a Mac, then I should get cheap to no service with it.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Lejla</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 20:36:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Psystar wants to force Apple to open up</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/08/30/psystar-wants-to-force-apple-to-open-up/#comment-1975539</link><description>Mathew,&lt;br&gt;Thanks for posting this. As MAC goes mainstream, I've been wondering this as well. Having recently bought a MacBook, I was struck by how much "price fixing" goes on. The price is always the same no matter where you go. I thought this was illegal independent of market share, but can only imagine that as MAC becomes a dominant player this will somehow get addressed either by competition or the regulators (or both).&lt;br&gt;Randall</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Randall Howard</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 08:04:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Psystar wants to force Apple to open up</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/08/30/psystar-wants-to-force-apple-to-open-up/#comment-1945679</link><description>"...buy a Dell Inspiron and run the Mac OS on it..."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That feels so wrong. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;A Thinkpad maybe or one of the less cheesy Vaios (that hopefully doesn't fall apart).</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chris Edwards</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 31 Aug 2008 18:41:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Psystar wants to force Apple to open up</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/08/30/psystar-wants-to-force-apple-to-open-up/#comment-1940600</link><description>"How come I can get a Macbook Pro and run Windows on it, but I can’t buy a Dell Inspiron and run the Mac OS on it? Doesn’t seem right somehow."  I'm sure you know the answer: Steve Jobs.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ex Bebox hacker</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 31 Aug 2008 12:16:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Psystar wants to force Apple to open up</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/08/30/psystar-wants-to-force-apple-to-open-up/#comment-1934455</link><description>Matthew, your position is the one currently accepted, in both Canada and the US.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The Whole Foods case strikes most US Anti-Trust lawyers as nutsy.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But I think that there is something to it: what is a market for a product without considering how the major player advertised for their consumers?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">michael_webster</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 20:47:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Psystar wants to force Apple to open up</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/08/30/psystar-wants-to-force-apple-to-open-up/#comment-1934397</link><description>Thanks, Michael -- I wasn't suggesting that we could use the Superior ruling to predict U.S. anti-trust decisions, just pointing out that the argument can go both ways.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mathewi</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 20:38:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Psystar wants to force Apple to open up</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/08/30/psystar-wants-to-force-apple-to-open-up/#comment-1934347</link><description>Matthew, the FTC lost the first round in their battle and then had it reversed.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I don't believe that we can predict US Anti-Trust decisions from looking at the Competition Tribunal.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But it will be interesting to follow, certainly Apple has tried to carve out its own market, and in the market ties software and hardware together.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">michael_webster</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 20:28:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Psystar wants to force Apple to open up</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/08/30/psystar-wants-to-force-apple-to-open-up/#comment-1932797</link><description>Thanks, Michael. On the other side of the equation, a propane company&lt;br&gt;in Canada successfully argued that acquiring another propane company&lt;br&gt;wouldn't impair competition -- even though it would give the company a&lt;br&gt;huge share of the propane market -- because the propane business was&lt;br&gt;just a subset of the overall heating market.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mathewi</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 18:01:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Psystar wants to force Apple to open up</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/08/30/psystar-wants-to-force-apple-to-open-up/#comment-1930889</link><description>You might want to follow the Whole Foods FTC action in which they are maintaining that the relevant market for Whole Foods is the small high end natural market</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">michael_webster</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 16:09:38 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>