<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Mathew's comments - Latest Comments in Pay for a blog feed? Not going to happen</title><link>http://mathewingram.disqus.com/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 07:35:31 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Pay for a blog feed? Not going to happen</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/01/26/pay-for-a-blog-feed-not-going-to-happen/#comment-106173</link><description>"it’s hard to monetize a blog if no one ever comes to the website and looks at the feeds"&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Read: It's hard to make money from trying to sell something that no one wants.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Simple economics... make good things, get readers, make money... not the other way round</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Adam_Y</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 07:35:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Pay for a blog feed? Not going to happen</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/01/26/pay-for-a-blog-feed-not-going-to-happen/#comment-103897</link><description>I wonder if I'm understanding this right - paying for RSS feeds or going right to the website directly? I'm a bad blog reader I keep all the cool stuff in iGoogle - and there are about 2 dozen sites that, if I like what I see in the rss reader bit, I open the entire blog in a new tab, because I don't want to miss anything! I use my rss reader as a bookmark ;-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'd rather pay for blog access to someone i'm interested in, rather than just the rss feed ;-)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jules</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2008 20:12:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Pay for a blog feed? Not going to happen</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/01/26/pay-for-a-blog-feed-not-going-to-happen/#comment-103576</link><description>Yeah, I know -- which is why I was suggesting that bloggers have to look at&lt;br&gt;other ways to make money that are offshoots of their blogs.  Think of your&lt;br&gt;blog as advertising, not as a place for advertising.  I don't think making&lt;br&gt;money from a blog (or at least any kind of substantial amount of money) is a&lt;br&gt;realistic proposition, really, except in maybe a handful of exceptional&lt;br&gt;cases.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mathewi</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2008 16:08:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Pay for a blog feed? Not going to happen</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/01/26/pay-for-a-blog-feed-not-going-to-happen/#comment-103571</link><description>No Mark, I don't feel "locked in" to a blog.  There are lots of other ways I&lt;br&gt;could promote myself, some of which might be even more effective. But I&lt;br&gt;think blogging is one of the easiest, cheapest and most rewarding methods,&lt;br&gt;and I really enjoy doing it.  In fact, I do it as much for my own purposes&lt;br&gt;-- as a way of thinking things through and drawing comment from others -- as&lt;br&gt;I do for any other reason.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mathewi</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2008 16:05:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Pay for a blog feed? Not going to happen</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/01/26/pay-for-a-blog-feed-not-going-to-happen/#comment-103567</link><description>I think what Allen is really driving at is the rise of RSS means fewer people actually visit blog sites, which hurts a blogger's ability to make money. I wrote about it a couple months ago:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.markevanstech.com/2007/11/26/what-if-no-one-actually-visits-blogs/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.markevanstech.com/2007/11/26/what-if...&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">buckpost</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2008 16:01:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Pay for a blog feed? Not going to happen</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/01/26/pay-for-a-blog-feed-not-going-to-happen/#comment-103532</link><description>Blog feeds are a commodity that happen to have a retail price of $0.00.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It seems like Allen Stern is looking for something with the ease and convenience of an RSS feed that people would be willing to pay for.  Thing is, and I mean no disrespect to you, Mathew, but as you've indicated above, the value proposition might not be there for someone to pay for blog content on a subscription basis.  Your blog does serve to:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;a)  provide you with a continual online presence&lt;br&gt;b)  draw people's attention to things that you find interesting&lt;br&gt;c)  provide some education&lt;br&gt;d)  provide you with a promotional platform, if you choose to use it that way&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Rex Hammock says it quite eloquently, doesn't he?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Matthew, a question:  do you feel like you are "locked in" to blogging?  In other words, do you feel that giving up a blog would actually hurt you as a professional and, to be blunt, as a product?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Another piece of data in my ongoing quest to come up with a new model to monetize content.  I'm really enjoying your writing.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mark Dykeman</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2008 15:43:49 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>