<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Mathew's comments - Latest Comments in Paul Graham on the Web 2.0 bubble</title><link>http://mathewingram.disqus.com/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Jul 2006 09:58:25 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Paul Graham on the Web 2.0 bubble</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/07/10/paul-graham-on-the-web-20-bubble/#comment-1294304</link><description>Good point, Luca.  Thanks for the comment.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Mathew</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mathew Ingram</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 10 Jul 2006 09:58:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Paul Graham on the Web 2.0 bubble</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/07/10/paul-graham-on-the-web-20-bubble/#comment-1294301</link><description>I agree with Paul. It's a matter of amount of investments There are a lot of VC investing money, but all of them are investing in something you can "touch with your hands" and most of them in services/applications which people are using. The problem, to me, is that not always you can find a business model which works. So, maybe you can find someone who is willing to pay (a big company ?) so you can sell to that company, but not always you find people who are willing to pay for the service you are offering.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">luca</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 10 Jul 2006 03:36:21 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>