<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Mathew's comments - Latest Comments in Nick Denton: Master of deception</title><link>http://mathewingram.disqus.com/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2008 23:31:47 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Nick Denton: Master of deception</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/10/04/nick-denton-master-of-deception/#comment-2886536</link><description>The Jeremy Wright memo is just begging for a Valleywag "100-word version" treatment. Something like: "for every post you write, we currently lose money; we've figured out that if we pay you less we might make money."</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bluelines</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2008 23:31:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Nick Denton: Master of deception</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/10/04/nick-denton-master-of-deception/#comment-2868948</link><description>But that's not odd. Nick still laid off 19 people! It'd be one thing if he was moving people from title to another - something I thought he'd be doing. But the three people at Valleywag, the tk people at Defamer, etc, etc are out of work.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">PKafka</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2008 18:50:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Nick Denton: Master of deception</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/10/04/nick-denton-master-of-deception/#comment-2868886</link><description>That's totally true, Peter -- I'm not saying your headline was wrong.  I just thought it was odd that everyone focused on the firing rather than the hiring.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mathewi</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2008 18:40:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Nick Denton: Master of deception</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/10/04/nick-denton-master-of-deception/#comment-2868749</link><description>Hey Mathew. We're crossing lots of streams today! Re: My headline - Nick fired 19 people. The fact that he hired 10 more doesn't change the fact that he canned 19.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">PKafka</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2008 18:17:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Nick Denton: Master of deception</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/10/04/nick-denton-master-of-deception/#comment-2867906</link><description>I think you're quite right, Dave,  that does seem to be the model.  And what the heck -- it seems to be working too  -)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mathewi</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2008 16:23:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Nick Denton: Master of deception</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/10/04/nick-denton-master-of-deception/#comment-2842608</link><description>Fact is: I think Gawker media has a high turn-over rate - I think that's Denton's secret.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Hire new blogger - starry-eyed and eager.&lt;br&gt;Work them to death &lt;br&gt;Fire them - let them fend for themselves having trained them in how to do gossip.&lt;br&gt;Hire new blogger.&lt;br&gt;Rinse and repeat.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">digidave</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2008 14:33:06 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>