-
Website
http://www.mathewingram.com/work -
Original page
http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/06/10/nick-carr-i-hate-the-internet-vol-7/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
scrawledinwax
23 comments · 1 points
-
webomatica
35 comments · 5 points
-
howardlindzon
46 comments · 69 points
-
JoeDuck
57 comments · 1 points
-
Karoli
32 comments · 39 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
In defence of newspapers and serendipity
3 weeks ago · 43 comments
-
Are independent bloggers an endangered species?
2 weeks ago · 8 comments
-
Bloggers, trust, MSM and correction fluid
1 week ago · 2 comments
-
Why media outlets want Facebook Connect
2 weeks ago · 1 comment
-
First Read: Follow the Breadcrumbs : CJR
2 weeks ago · 1 comment
-
In defence of newspapers and serendipity
But I think he's wrong for a different reason. On a geological timetable, our species stopped relying on biological evolution as a way of responding to change relatively recently. Instead, we evolve memes and learning, since this can keep up with how fast we change our own environment.
Who's to say that short-term, information-skimming, seven-chats-going-at-once behaviors aren't just another step in that evolution? I suspect that as a species we learn whatever's useful; my grandmother knew the length of the ten longest rivers in the world. I can find the length of the ten thousand. Does that make me better than her? No, just better adapted for the modern world.
So maybe Google is making us collectively smarter.
Similarly, twitch-reflex, information-skimming humans may be just what our global, information-saturated future needs. I don't think Google's making us dumber. Just helping us adapt faster.
I remember going to the library and looking up a book or two via the computer. I would then go over to that section and look for other books on my topic. I would skim those books to determine which would help me. Google makes that a million times faster.
hence, the news is polls about what people think is the news ..... a sign of sickness in both media and consumers of media ..... think the internet has had any influence there>
different. It's just presenting us with more information, and doing
it faster. And as Alistair suggests, it's up to us to adapt to that.
The real issue for me is the quick to judgment that this is all a bad thing. To assume this is making us stupid (or frankly stupider than we already are) is quite the hypothesis based on nothing.
I'm sure when we went from hunching over like apes to standing up right, had Nick Carr been around, he might have been concerned about this too. Only time will tell if this in fact makes us more stupid or alternatively (what i believe in the longer term), far more innovative, creative, and better critical thinkers.
Could not the same be said of almost every newspaper editorial, ever? You get a deadline and six inches of empty space to fill. But yeah, he does seem to spend a lot of effort on it.
that (and I say that as someone who used to write them). Perhaps Nick
missed his calling :-)