<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Mathew's comments - Latest Comments in Newspapers need to work with aggregators</title><link>http://mathewingram.disqus.com/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2007 20:39:51 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Newspapers need to work with aggregators</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/06/18/newspapers-need-to-work-with-aggregators/#comment-1314756</link><description>Do you think that newspapers, or more broadly, large new organizations will continue to flourish?   What will happen to individual, professional media creators in a future where large media orgs wield far less power, influence (and ability to pay)?  That's what I'm grappling with.  I've not seen a model that deals with the future reality of professional journalism yet.  It's almost an emperor-has-no-clothes situation... we all see it coming, but no one knows what to do about it....</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mat</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2007 20:39:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Newspapers need to work with aggregators</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/06/18/newspapers-need-to-work-with-aggregators/#comment-1314757</link><description>Thanks for the comment, Mat -- but I wasn't so much talking about using that type of strategy for individuals (although I think it can work for some, as you point out).  I think the point was that newspapers as a whole should be doing this.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mathew</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2007 20:35:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Newspapers need to work with aggregators</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/06/18/newspapers-need-to-work-with-aggregators/#comment-1314758</link><description>Yes, but I just don't see this scaling across all professional content producers.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;While this strategy can work for a select few (yourself, Scott, a handful of others) I'm not sure this is a viable strategy for budding professional journalists entering the market.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mat</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2007 06:24:26 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>