<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Mathew's comments - Latest Comments in Newspapers ignore Google at their peril</title><link>http://mathewingram.disqus.com/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2007 08:33:43 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Newspapers ignore Google at their peril</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/08/18/newspapers-ignore-google-at-their-peril/#comment-1315673</link><description>It's not going away. I think it's a great idea.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The real reason for Newspapers continued sharp decline is the fact that they have no idea how to leverage a community. The News, which was once scarce is now abundant. That means that newspapers need to shift from being general content creators to context creators.&lt;br&gt;Unfortunately, google beat them to it.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">chartreuse</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2007 08:33:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Newspapers ignore Google at their peril</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/08/18/newspapers-ignore-google-at-their-peril/#comment-1315672</link><description>I agree Tish. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And Steven, I still haven't seen a story with comments on it -- I looked for one of the ones that appeared in screenshots when the feature was first announced but couldn't find it.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mathew</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 19 Aug 2007 15:45:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Newspapers ignore Google at their peril</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/08/18/newspapers-ignore-google-at-their-peril/#comment-1315671</link><description>Has anyone seen any examples of a commented  on google news story?  Is there a way to aggregate for stories that have comments.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steven Noble</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 18 Aug 2007 21:41:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Newspapers ignore Google at their peril</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/08/18/newspapers-ignore-google-at-their-peril/#comment-1315669</link><description>neither kerfuffle, nor brouhaha....more like tempest-in-a-teapot...it must've been a slow news day for so many folks to get their knickers in a bunch over this.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What the LATimes said was pretty much what went around the blogosphere about the whole GoogleNews comments thing anyway...except maybe for the Bin Laden thing.  That sounded more like an inside joke that originated at some conference, got published on somebody's blog, and then everybody said "well, it was funny &lt;i&gt;at the time&lt;/i&gt;..."</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tish Grier</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 18 Aug 2007 18:28:46 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>