<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Mathew's comments - Latest Comments in News satire is harder than it looks</title><link>http://mathewingram.disqus.com/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 13:41:03 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: News satire is harder than it looks</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/11/09/news-satire-is-harder-than-it-looks/#comment-96546</link><description>I agree it's not easy, and there are probably too many news-satire sites.  Nevertheless, I'm giving it a shot.  Check it out: &lt;a href="http://newslampoon.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://newslampoon.com&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rick</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 13:41:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: News satire is harder than it looks</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/11/09/news-satire-is-harder-than-it-looks/#comment-35892</link><description>I'd say there are two things a news satire site needs to be: funny...and well-written. The writing on 23/6 is stiff, leaden and boring. If the writing were better, I wouldn't even care if it made me smile or not. At least I'd be entertained. I like to think my own news satire site is, if not 'funny', at least mildly diverting and maybe even clever. And I do hope it's well-written. But that, of course, is for others to judge...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">horatio salt</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2007 00:21:07 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>