-
Website
http://www.mathewingram.com/work -
Original page
http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/04/06/new-york-times-blog-trolling-101/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
-
Top Commenters
-
Popular Threads
All Comments
That said, there is something to say for noticing the emergence of a piecework occupation where there is an economic incentive to produce 24x7, as well as immense pressure (on many) to stay hooked to newswires. No surprise that such a "job" has a tendency to burn people out.
intended. But I wish he had spent more time talking about the
economics of blogging, by maybe bringing in some of the commentary
about Valleywag's pay structure, etc., rather than going straight for
the easy and inflammatory "it causes heart attacks" angle.
death-by-piecework-pay approach, rather than
bloggers-have-no-self-discipline. As always, heart attacks trump economics.
If Mike Arrington has a sleep disorder as a result of blogging, it's not the blog's fault. It's his type A personality that pushes him to be first with the next shiny thing.
For those who have a problem with this, I can only suggest a perspective adjustment which would include stepping back and asking whether the world will still turn if that blog post waits to be written until the next day. I assure you it will. Then they should step away from the computer and the gadgets, enjoy the lovely spring day with some good friends, and realize that the world still turned.
Life's too short to lose sleep and sanity over blogging. Wars, famine, starvation, etc...maybe. But not blogging.
whatever. but here's a thought: instead of doing your derivative daily, why not surprise the world with an original story. i know - that involves actual WORK. so...probably not.
LOL
derivative comment on my mediocre mumblings. Here's a thought: how
about coming up with something original? Or better yet, give me a
link to the blog where you're generating all those stimulating,
original and thought-provoking posts, and I'll be sure to drop by.
Actually, I found some grains of truth in the Times article. Sure, it had its link-baiting hype potential, but then again so have all those other articles over the past 2-3 years in pubs like BusinessWeek and New York Magazine that shrieked "you too can make big bucks from blogging!" (and then went on to profile Arianna Huffington and Mike Arrington and Josh Marshall and the scant few others that make big blog money....)
Thing is, when you *are* doing blogging as a career or career path (as I have for the past two years--with a modicum of success) it *is* a lot of stress. It's sometimes a lot of long hours for not a lot of pay. It's having no boundaries in your life because you have to get a project completed, or a client's in need of something ,by an insanely short deadline. It's trying to come up with the right "conversational tone" for a marketing campaign. It's trying to write in a way that's going to get the eyeballs of the 18-34s while getting the jobs and respect from the 34-54s.
It only gets easier when you've put together a decent reputation and people are willing to take a chance with you (but it's still pretty tough.) Even then, the standards are high because you are working in a field that is brand new, that has no hard stats to back it up, and that many are looking to be the savior for industries with failing business models.
It won't kill you, but the stress will get to you if you're looking to be Arrington or Marshall or to go viral like Coke and Mentos or Lenovo. If you keep perspective, though, and not measure your success by the successes of others, then you'll be ok. Easier said, however, than done.
rather, trying to turn a blog into a business -- isn't stressful. But
is it any more inherently stressful than trying to turn a love for
bicycle repair or hair-styling into a business? Probably not.
People who are earning a living elsewhere and blogging for free are just not part of this game - ironically they (we) are the ones crashing the piecework market, which imho makes it unsustainable.
Anyway, these thoughts in more depth here:
http://broadstuff.com/archives/833-Bloggers-vs-...
or the competitive threat from those who blog for free. That's
something that is affecting all media. As I said to Paul, I wish Matt
had spent a bit more time on that and a bit less on the "blogging will
kill you" idea.
http://tinyurl.com/3paf74
Truth is, the blogosphere has muscled its way into traditional media waters (I just canceled all my newspapers) and the more people rely on bloggers for news, the more the responsibility to be accurate weighs upon them.
Watch "All the Presidents Men" a few times and watch Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein check their sources a hundred times before going with the story.
Even the successful blogs seem to validate this truth, in that volume always seems to trump quality. That is, the focus is on generating as many posts as possible to chase pageview growth that I'm sure is accompanied by bottom-feeding and even declining CPM rates. It's much easier in the short term to assume the position of sweatshop 2.0 rather than be innovative and work out how to create a property that will attract a sustained, high-value audience and drive up those CPMs.
It's interesting that all of the examples cited are technology-related blogs, which perhaps does nothing more than reveal that the tech/geek audience simply isn't attractive to the mainstream advertisers who spend 90% of the ad dollars. Combine low barriers to entry with a product the market doesn't value very highly and a sweatshop is all-but inevitable.
Agreed. making it in blogging probably does indeed have the same or at least a similar amount of stress as making it in any high-volume, hyperactive business (I'm reminded of friends who used to own a gaming company.... or any start-up....)
and I too liked Doc's response. You should check out dana boyd's and Renee Blodgett's as well.
Now that it's midnight, I can write mine ;-)