<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Mathew's comments - Latest Comments in MySpace vs Photobucket: obvious, but dumb</title><link>http://mathewingram.disqus.com/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2007 18:15:52 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: MySpace vs Photobucket: obvious, but dumb</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/04/11/myspace-vs-photobucket-obvious-but-dumb/#comment-1313548</link><description>This is starting to smell like an opportunity for someone who's happy to create an ungreedy open alternative to Myspace.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rob Hyndman</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2007 18:15:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: MySpace vs Photobucket: obvious, but dumb</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/04/11/myspace-vs-photobucket-obvious-but-dumb/#comment-1313547</link><description>I agree with you on this one.  Allowing users to use tools from other services on the Myspace network is likely to keep them happy and prevent another social networking site from gaining ground on MySpace by being more open.  If I were in charge of MySpace I would want to see what services my users were integrating into their profiles to see where we could improve our features and make them a better alternative. By blocking other services it is basically admitting that the built-in features are inferior and can not compete with other services.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Kevin Bondelli</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2007 16:37:27 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>