<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Mathew's comments - Latest Comments in MSFT and YHOO: Then there were two</title><link>http://mathewingram.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://mathewingram.disqus.com/msft_and_yhoo_then_there_were_two/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 15:10:01 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: MSFT and YHOO: Then there were two</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/02/01/msft-and-yhoo-then-there-were-two/#comment-118113</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Great minds think alike, Stan  :-)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mathewi</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 15:10:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: MSFT and YHOO: Then there were two</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/02/01/msft-and-yhoo-then-there-were-two/#comment-118035</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Heh. Surprisingly similar to my blog post, although I haven't read your coverage before. I agree, this is desperation; Yahoo pretty much has no choice but to accept. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Stan_Schroeder</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 14:48:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: MSFT and YHOO: Then there were two</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/02/01/msft-and-yhoo-then-there-were-two/#comment-117411</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Think you're out of luck, Robert -- I would be very surprised if this deal&lt;br&gt;doesn't happen.  The only thing that could potentially knock it off the&lt;br&gt;rails would be anti-trust concerns, and even there Google is already 75 per&lt;br&gt;cent of the market so the feds aren't likely to care.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mathewi</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 11:54:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: MSFT and YHOO: Then there were two</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/02/01/msft-and-yhoo-then-there-were-two/#comment-117398</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yahoo please please please, no! I have many yahoo services and would hate to have Microsoft involved in your products!!! NO!!!!!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I would hate to see Yahoo taken over by Microsoft it would be horrible!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Robert Dall</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 11:49:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: MSFT and YHOO: Then there were two</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/02/01/msft-and-yhoo-then-there-were-two/#comment-117257</link><description>&lt;p&gt;When it comes to Web properties, News Corp. only has MySpace really -- and&lt;br&gt;IAC isn't in the same league as Micro-hoo or Google, I don't think.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mathewi</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 11:04:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: MSFT and YHOO: Then there were two</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/02/01/msft-and-yhoo-then-there-were-two/#comment-117213</link><description>&lt;p&gt;What about News Corp. or IAC as Web titans?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mark Evans</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 10:50:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: MSFT and YHOO: Then there were two</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/02/01/msft-and-yhoo-then-there-were-two/#comment-117070</link><description>&lt;p&gt;thnx&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mathewi</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 10:08:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: MSFT and YHOO: Then there were two</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/02/01/msft-and-yhoo-then-there-were-two/#comment-117066</link><description>&lt;p&gt;thnx.  typing too fast.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mathewi</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 10:07:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: MSFT and YHOO: Then there were two</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/02/01/msft-and-yhoo-then-there-were-two/#comment-117044</link><description>&lt;p&gt;matt - "If Microsoft’s $4.6-billion (U.S."&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;tis 44.6B&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">/pd</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 10:01:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: MSFT and YHOO: Then there were two</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/02/01/msft-and-yhoo-then-there-were-two/#comment-117023</link><description>&lt;p&gt;//And then there were two. If Microsoft’s $4.6-billion (U.S.) bid for struggling Web giant Yahoo Inc. is successful//&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;shouldn't it be $44.6 billion bid. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">lazy</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 09:56:14 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>