Mathew's comments - Latest Comments in MSFT and YHOO: Then there were two

Re: MSFT and YHOO: Then there were two

mathewi — Fri, 01 Feb 2008 15:10:01 -0000

Great minds think alike, Stan :-)

Re: MSFT and YHOO: Then there were two

Stan_Schroeder — Fri, 01 Feb 2008 14:48:48 -0000

Heh. Surprisingly similar to my blog post, although I haven't read your coverage before. I agree, this is desperation; Yahoo pretty much has no choice but to accept.

Re: MSFT and YHOO: Then there were two

mathewi — Fri, 01 Feb 2008 11:54:02 -0000

Think you're out of luck, Robert -- I would be very surprised if this deal
doesn't happen. The only thing that could potentially knock it off the
rails would be anti-trust concerns, and even there Google is already 75 per
cent of the market so the feds aren't likely to care.

Re: MSFT and YHOO: Then there were two

Robert Dall — Fri, 01 Feb 2008 11:49:48 -0000

Yahoo please please please, no! I have many yahoo services and would hate to have Microsoft involved in your products!!! NO!!!!!

I would hate to see Yahoo taken over by Microsoft it would be horrible!

Re: MSFT and YHOO: Then there were two

mathewi — Fri, 01 Feb 2008 11:04:02 -0000

When it comes to Web properties, News Corp. only has MySpace really -- and
IAC isn't in the same league as Micro-hoo or Google, I don't think.

Re: MSFT and YHOO: Then there were two

buckpost — Fri, 01 Feb 2008 10:50:15 -0000

What about News Corp. or IAC as Web titans?

Re: MSFT and YHOO: Then there were two

mathewi — Fri, 01 Feb 2008 10:08:02 -0000

thnx

Re: MSFT and YHOO: Then there were two

mathewi — Fri, 01 Feb 2008 10:07:02 -0000

thnx. typing too fast.

Re: MSFT and YHOO: Then there were two

/pd — Fri, 01 Feb 2008 10:01:12 -0000

matt - "If Microsoft’s $4.6-billion (U.S."

tis 44.6B

Re: MSFT and YHOO: Then there were two

lazy — Fri, 01 Feb 2008 09:56:14 -0000

//And then there were two. If Microsoft’s $4.6-billion (U.S.) bid for struggling Web giant Yahoo Inc. is successful//

shouldn't it be $44.6 billion bid.