<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Mathew's comments - Latest Comments in Maybe people don&amp;#8217;t really want UGC</title><link>http://mathewingram.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://mathewingram.disqus.com/maybe_people_don8217t_really_want_ugc/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 18:53:37 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Maybe people don&amp;#8217;t really want UGC</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/10/22/maybe-people-dont-really-want-ugc/#comment-1316473</link><description>&lt;p&gt;If UGC is posed only as "creative" work - your point is definitely worth making.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Of course, there is more to the "wisdom of crowds thing" or the "wikinomics thing" than just a bunch of backyard wrasslers seeking Specialness as described in Hal Niedzviecki's last book.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;That sounds like supply without demand. I think that's what a lot of the long tail is, at least in digital content. Unsuccessful artists who now have a cool web 2.0 excuse for wasting their time can talk about that whole tail thing :)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;However, where the individual's contribution amounts to valuable *information* that can be shared and tapped into by others, then it becomes powerful.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It's out there. We'll find it. :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Andrew Goodman</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 18:53:37 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>