Mathew's comments - Latest Comments in LinkedIn and Facebook: Collision course?

Re: LinkedIn and Facebook: Collision course?

mathewi — Mon, 10 Dec 2007 17:05:01 -0000

That's interesting, Doc -- my Facebook network continues to grow
daily, but my LinkedIn network hasn't budged in a while. Maybe that
says more about me than it does about either one :-)

Re: LinkedIn and Facebook: Collision course?

DocThink — Mon, 10 Dec 2007 17:00:12 -0000

Okay, it could be just be that I am old, but most of my for-real friends don't use Facebook. The social networkers among my peers are more likely to have a professional profile on LinkedIn.

Forty-somethings whose kids have been through xanga, then myspace, and now Facebook are not flocking to Facebook, but my LinkedIn network keeps growing. Maybe it's a DC thing, or maybe my circle is odd, but FB is pretty quiet among my peers. Just another anecdotal experience..

Re: LinkedIn and Facebook: Collision course?

mathewi — Mon, 10 Dec 2007 15:01:02 -0000

Thanks for the comment, mojodean -- it's true that at least LinkedIn
is thinking about how to adapt to fit what its market wants. It's
interesting to think about what the transition from Xanga to
Friendster to MySpace and Facebook has meant in terms of the evolution
of social networks, or whether in fact much has changed at all. And
will people want one network for business and one for social purposes,
or do they just want one portal for everything?

Re: LinkedIn and Facebook: Collision course?

mathewi — Mon, 10 Dec 2007 14:07:02 -0000

That's true, Tish -- and I think one of the things we're seeing with
both Facebook and LinkedIn is people (and the sites themselves) trying
to figure out how to balance those two things, and how to allow people
to make more distinctions rather than lump everyone into either the
"friend" or "business contact" buckets.

Re: LinkedIn and Facebook: Collision course?

Tish Grier — Mon, 10 Dec 2007 13:25:45 -0000

Matt...one thing I often find is that the worlds of tech and business journalism (as well as certain sectors of marketing) are a lot different in their sense of "friend" than other professions and in people's perceptions. Hence, it makes a great deal for folks to have a the option of keeping a nice separation between church and state, as you say.

There are times when letting your employer know your political affiliations or what you did over the weekend is inappropriate (esp. for young people just entering the job market.) So, I worry a bit about some of LinkedIn's new features and if it's not getting a tad too Facebook-y contingent on what the business journos and Silicon Valley techies are saying about it rather than in what its customers need. Frankly, we should be able to pick our friends *and* pick our business associates and keep them separate until the time is right. Working with like-minded friends who know all your comings and goings (via social networking) can be a real double-edged sword when the business end of the friendship doesn't go according to the "rules" of either business or friendship.

Re: LinkedIn and Facebook: Collision course?

mathewi — Mon, 10 Dec 2007 12:10:02 -0000

So maybe LinkedIn users are from Mars, and Facebook users are from Venus? :-)

For some reason, I keep thinking of Research In Motion when I think of
LinkedIn -- RIM is a company that was very successful focusing
strictly on the business user, but eventually started to move more
toward the non-business or consumer user, more or less out of
necessity. I have a feeling LinkedIn is doing (or will do) the same.

But how will die-hard LinkedIn users respond? For every one that likes
the more social features, there will be some who liked it better the
way it was.

Re: LinkedIn and Facebook: Collision course?

aidanhenry — Mon, 10 Dec 2007 12:04:08 -0000

Mathew,

I'm in the same boat as you. I barely use LinkedIn. I use Facebook almost exclusively. Nearly all of my friends and colleagues use FB, and I find it much more productive and less confusing than LinkedIn.

Although I do like the new changes, it's highly unlikely that I'm going to cross over or devote any more time to LinkedIn at this point. I do agree with Ryan's point, however, that certain industries are more suited to leverage LinkedIn than others...

Cheers,
Aidan
www.MappingTheWeb.com

Re: LinkedIn and Facebook: Collision course?

mathewi — Mon, 10 Dec 2007 11:23:02 -0000

That's a good point, Ryan -- and I think if I were in that kind of
business, I would probably see a lot more value in it. So perhaps
it's dependent on what you need from a social-networking tool.

Re: LinkedIn and Facebook: Collision course?

mathewi — Mon, 10 Dec 2007 11:22:02 -0000

I guess I don't have the same separation between church and state,
Sulemaan. Most of the people I am interested in being connected with
-- whether for business or personal reasons -- are on Facebook. There
are some I am connected with only on LinkedIn, but my interaction with
them is minimal. Will I increase that interaction because of
LinkedIn's new features? I'm not sure, but I think it's probably
unlikely.

Re: LinkedIn and Facebook: Collision course?

Sulemaan — Mon, 10 Dec 2007 10:54:31 -0000

I view Linkedin and Facebook as being separate. Linkedin is for work and Facebook is for play. I don't connect to the same people on Facebook as I do on Linkedin. I like to call it separation of Church and State.

I also think that Linkedin only becomes useful once you get critical mass of connections. But like anything it's what you put in that translates what you get out.

Re: LinkedIn and Facebook: Collision course?

Ryan Coleman — Mon, 10 Dec 2007 09:57:48 -0000

"I think it does, although like my friend Mark Evans I rarely use it. "

Yeah, there's certainly certain contexts where LInkedIn either makes loads of sense, or none at all.

On our end we use it all the time as we're a heavily partner centric business. If we need to get an in-road with a specific vendor the first place we go to is usually LinkedIn to see who we know at the company, or closely connected to it.

It's created a lot of conversations for us that would have otherwise taken months to get started.