-
Top Commenters
-
Community
-
Popular Threads
-
Recent Comments
- I agree, Daniel. I think Nick's model makes a lot of sense, and for the most part it seems to be paying off -- and not just for him, but for lots of his bloggers as well.
- "If you're a blogger at an established site like Gawker, it's quite obvious that for every dollar you make in bonus pay, Denton has made much more in terms of extra advertising revenue. You really earned ...
- I stupidly didn't even check to see if you had written anything on it, Felix -- I should have known that you would have. And an excellent analysis of the situation it is. As you note, some of the ...
- Hi Matthew -- I take it you've seen my latest <a href="http://www.portfolio.com/views/blogs/market-movers/2008/07/03/blogonomics-gawkers-latest-pay-cut">2,500 words on the subject</a>, so I won't reprise ...
- "Thank you Matt for this important reminder. I sure hope I don't confuse these two bastions of journalistic integrity ever again." +1 to the Duck
Like, Facebook is so over, dude
8 comments
-
Sebastien Provencher 4 months ago with 1 point
I think "grown-ups" who jumped on Facebook in the last few months and industry pundits (like you and me) who "discovered" Facebook last summer are coming to the realization that Facebook is really just a place to have fun and re-connect with old friends. That's not a bad thing as it's teaching social media etiquette to a whole generation of online users but it's not (yet?) a killer must-use site. I explored that concept in a recent blog post called "Facebook is just a game".
And like you, I find myself using Twitter more and more as a business tool. -
I think that Rory Cellan-Jones (and Sebastien Provencher here in the comment section) are probably right in that it's Generation X and older generations who are the cause for the drop in Facebook usage (assuming seasonality isn't a factor). I know that my Facebook usage is a fraction of what it used to be since I migrated out of the exploratory phase.
On the other hand, I'm using Twitter more and more.
In short, Facebook's core market will be the cohort that's been using it since their teenage years and I'm sure that will continue to grow over time as younger kids hit the age when they'd be interested in using it. -
It will level off, it has to. Most people I know who are not involved heavily in technology (mostly outside the valley) can't or don't use facebook at work, and a lot of the parents I know are on it simply to monitor their kids.
-
Mathew - I believe it is seasonal as well.
http://www.centernetworks.com/facebook-dip-seas... -
Here's what I think:
http://fourreasonswhy.com/2008/02/22/facebook-i... -
it’s a bit much to ring the bell of doom based on one downtick
Yes, it is. However it's interesting to look at the way many online game sites - in some ways the precursors to social networking - graph in terms of traffic. They usually show rapid increases as people become interested in the game and play it obsessively, followed by decline. More importantly, as developers get around to doing the architecture right and we see seamless internet surfing using open social tools where the social network=the internet, I'm wondering how Facebook and Myspace will play more than a mildly supportive role in things. -
I would agree, Joe -- I think OpenSocial and DiSo and movements like
that are one of the biggest threats to Facebook as a platform, to the
extent that they allow people to create their own social networks
through their blogs or websites or whatever.
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 4:57 PM, Disqus -
I think at the end of the day, since these sites are all ad supported, it doesn't matter so long as wherever the data is being pulled from can show ads to the users. That'll be the challenge - if everything is open, determining where the user will see the ad and whoever controls that - wins.


