<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Mathew's comments - Latest Comments in Kleiner: Web 2.0 is so over, dude</title><link>http://mathewingram.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://mathewingram.disqus.com/kleiner_web_20_is_so_over_dude/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 08:28:34 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Kleiner: Web 2.0 is so over, dude</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/11/05/kleiner-web-20-is-so-over-dude/#comment-1316774</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The interesting thing about my post about funding Web 2.0 companies is that we don't have a definition of the term Web 2.0. Which doesn't really matter, because we are now in a 2.5ish transition to something new... Come to our 2.5 Web conference in SF in December :-)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tom Foremski</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 08:28:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Kleiner: Web 2.0 is so over, dude</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/11/05/kleiner-web-20-is-so-over-dude/#comment-1316780</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;startup CEOs hoping to get rich quick can go back to working at Kinko’s .... &lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;... where they'll work hard for 3000 years making 3 trillion copies to repay their 5 million round of VC funding.   That's a virtuous cycle, right?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Joe Duck</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 13:31:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Kleiner: Web 2.0 is so over, dude</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/11/05/kleiner-web-20-is-so-over-dude/#comment-1316778</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hey -- I haven't used the word "dude" in a headline since February!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mathew</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 16:28:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Kleiner: Web 2.0 is so over, dude</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/11/05/kleiner-web-20-is-so-over-dude/#comment-1316776</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Mathew, what's with all the "dude" references? :-D&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Agreed on the web 2.0 financing stuff tho!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rick Mahn</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 16:19:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Kleiner: Web 2.0 is so over, dude</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/11/05/kleiner-web-20-is-so-over-dude/#comment-1316783</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"Web2.0" may be a little dry now, but the Web in general sure isn't.  Online advertising is still posting healthy gains, and hypertargeted ads (or 'social ads') in social networks is just going to further drive the growth rate upwards.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Eric</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 14:15:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Kleiner: Web 2.0 is so over, dude</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/11/05/kleiner-web-20-is-so-over-dude/#comment-1316782</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Did they say anything about Web 3.0?  Cuz I've got this killer Twitter-meets-semantic-Web social networking video sharing platform I'm building...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jeremy Toeman</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 10:05:36 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>