http://mathewingram.disqus.com/enThu, 03 Jul 2008 14:42:06 -0000http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/07/03/judge-to-youtube-cough-up-those-ips/#comment-808880As far as I can tell it definitely means that, Mark. When it comes to<br>Canada, the proposed bill doesn't give content companies the right to<br>compel ISPs or other hosting services to reveal IP addresses -- it<br>just creates a "notice and notice" system whereby if the copyright<br>holder becomes aware of activity by a user, it can let the ISP know<br>and then the provider has to pass that notice onto the user. That's as<br>far as it goes. In order to get a specific user's info, the content<br>company would have to go to court and get a court order.mathewiThu, 03 Jul 2008 14:42:06 -0000http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/07/03/judge-to-youtube-cough-up-those-ips/#comment-808014So does this mean if Viacom wanted it could take this information and knock on the doors of the people who uploaded the content and sue them?<br><br>This seems very very scary. Is this what we have in store here in Canada with Bill C-61?<br><br>MarkMark McKayThu, 03 Jul 2008 12:55:40 -0000