Hello! Mathew's comments is using DISQUS, a powerful comment system, to manage its comments. Learn more.
Community Page
- www.mathewingram.com/work Jump to website »
-
Subscribe -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
Popular Threads
-
Recent Comments
- "1. Just because the New York Times does something doesn't make it right. 2. Describing something as a rumour, or putting it in the form of a question, doesn't make it OK to...
- Thanks a lot for sharing
- I think this is the dangerous trend we are on that the media only tells people what it wants and attempts to manipulate than allow people to make up their own mines
- It would be nice if we all made our own clothes out of hemp fiber, and used wind power to generate all of our energy, and so on. But that probably isn’t going to happen any time soon either.
- dsfasdfsf
Jump to original thread »
In the long-running Viacom vs. YouTube case — one that falls into the “desperately trying not to adapt” category — a judge has ruled that the Google-owned video site has to turn over a record of every user who has ever watched a YouTube video, either
... Continue reading »
1 year ago
This seems very very scary. Is this what we have in store here in Canada with Bill C-61?
Mark
1 year ago
Canada, the proposed bill doesn't give content companies the right to
compel ISPs or other hosting services to reveal IP addresses -- it
just creates a "notice and notice" system whereby if the copyright
holder becomes aware of activity by a user, it can let the ISP know
and then the provider has to pass that notice onto the user. That's as
far as it goes. In order to get a specific user's info, the content
company would have to go to court and get a court order.