<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Mathew's comments - Latest Comments in Journalism: Filtering, interpretation, context</title><link>http://mathewingram.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://mathewingram.disqus.com/journalism_filtering_interpretation_context/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 14:57:36 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Journalism: Filtering, interpretation, context</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/11/20/journalism-filtering-interpretation-context/#comment-3919018</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Wow, talk about overload... Good article but this is really not written with our attention scarcity in mind.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rafi Kam</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 14:57:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Journalism: Filtering, interpretation, context</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/11/20/journalism-filtering-interpretation-context/#comment-3914702</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks, Mark.  I totally agree.  And that Shirky speech was excellent.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mathewi</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 11:11:22 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>