<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Mathew's comments - Latest Comments in Josh Wolf: journalist or troublemaker?</title><link>http://mathewingram.disqus.com/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 05:09:31 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Josh Wolf: journalist or troublemaker?</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/04/14/josh-wolf-journalist-or-troublemaker/#comment-1313691</link><description>You're right to highlight the journalist/non-journalist issue, and Josh's example of the pamhleteers is an important one.  By looking at the values that need protecting, rather than argiung over official definitions of 'journalist', we can update our civic &amp;amp; legal system to the internet age. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In &lt;a href="Josh Wolf free but citizen journalism under threat" rel="nofollow"&gt;my post about Josh's release&lt;/a&gt; i propose that, from a human rights perspective (which is what the First Amendment embodies) we should  drop the category of journalist altogether and find other terms for our right to participate and to be heard. "In harsh times, is it enough to be reporters, or do we need to become defenders?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;dan</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dan mcquillan</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 05:09:31 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>