<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Mathew's comments - Latest Comments in Jason Calacanis has left the building</title><link>http://mathewingram.disqus.com/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2006 01:45:15 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Jason Calacanis has left the building</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/11/16/jason-calacanis-has-left-the-building/#comment-1303066</link><description>UPDATE: Jason Calacanis has admitted on his blog that he is in fact leaving Netscape.&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://calacanis.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;calacanis.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;-- and that the NYT had the right of it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If you will excuse me, its time for me to eat some crow ;)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tony</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2006 01:45:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Jason Calacanis has left the building</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/11/16/jason-calacanis-has-left-the-building/#comment-1303064</link><description>Yeah, I'm not convinced the NYT got the scoop there -- Calacanis isn't yet, apparently, confirming anything.  Anyone IM's him gets the same response.  There's nothing on his blog either.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;While its all but certain what will happen, I'm not sure where the evidence is to be announcing it as fact.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tony</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2006 00:23:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Jason Calacanis has left the building</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/11/16/jason-calacanis-has-left-the-building/#comment-1303062</link><description>Traffic doesn't look too hot either: &lt;a href="http://www.alexaholic.com/netscape.com+digg.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.alexaholic.com/netscape.com+digg.com&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mathew Ingram</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 16 Nov 2006 22:38:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Jason Calacanis has left the building</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/11/16/jason-calacanis-has-left-the-building/#comment-1303060</link><description>Press.  Whats that worth :) .  Seriously though.  No meat, he was baaaad.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">howardlindzon</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 16 Nov 2006 22:36:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Jason Calacanis has left the building</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/11/16/jason-calacanis-has-left-the-building/#comment-1303058</link><description>You are right, Muhammad, it is a little unfair -- and I used that word knowing that it would get a reaction. I think there is still a lot of debate about whether paying submitters of sites to Digg or Netscape is a valid business strategy, or whether it was merely an attenton-grabbing gesture on Jason's part and a way of trying to suck some of the momentum away from Digg.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mathew Ingram</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 16 Nov 2006 21:01:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Jason Calacanis has left the building</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/11/16/jason-calacanis-has-left-the-building/#comment-1303055</link><description>Hey Matt, &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I think you are a little unfair when you say 'bribing' the top posters. My bias (for getting paid) aside, I think this statement from Jason explains it all:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"If we're (DIGG, Delicious, Flickr, Reddit, MySpace, Netscape, etc) are going to make businesses out of this space we should share the wealth."</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Muhammad Saleem</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 16 Nov 2006 20:47:11 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>