<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Mathew's comments - Latest Comments in Items that might grow up to be blog posts</title><link>http://mathewingram.disqus.com/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Apr 2006 08:35:30 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Items that might grow up to be blog posts</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/04/04/items-that-might-grow-up-to-be-blog-posts/#comment-1293456</link><description>I think you're right, Eric. Phil seems to have jumped to all sorts of conclusions based on not much evidence.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Mathew</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mathew</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 05 Apr 2006 08:35:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Items that might grow up to be blog posts</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/04/04/items-that-might-grow-up-to-be-blog-posts/#comment-1293454</link><description>I don't buy Sim's argument. Tech.memeorandum's traffic is down... okay, that can tell us any number of things: there are meme trackers and meme diggers a-plenty these days, so perhaps memeorandum's market share is dropping (I think Gabe's expansion strategy is fab-o, by the way, as I point out &lt;a href="http://blogcritics.org/archives/2006/04/04/105130.php" rel="nofollow"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;). Or perhaps there haven't been quite as many red hot news stories in the past few months.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Another possibility -- and another something I point out in the piece above -- is that tech.memeorandum can do more to expand the number of sources that it covers.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Eric Berlin</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 05 Apr 2006 08:30:55 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>