<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Mathew's comments - Latest Comments in Items that might become blog posts</title><link>http://mathewingram.disqus.com/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 May 2006 16:59:54 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Items that might become blog posts</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/05/24/items-that-might-become-blog-posts/#comment-1293813</link><description>Yes, Tamera -- I think technically it would be copyright infringement.  That's the legal term, whereas plagiarism is more of a moral concept.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks for the comment.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Mathew</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mathew Ingram</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 24 May 2006 16:59:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Items that might become blog posts</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/05/24/items-that-might-become-blog-posts/#comment-1293808</link><description>I'm still trying to get a grasp on why it would be considered plagarism if it is sourced properly... wouldn't it then be copyright infringement?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tamera Kremer</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 24 May 2006 16:37:02 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>