<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Mathew's comments - Latest Comments in It&amp;#8217;s not Flock vs. Performancing</title><link>http://mathewingram.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://mathewingram.disqus.com/it8217s_not_flock_vs_performancing/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2005 10:06:05 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: It&amp;#8217;s not Flock vs. Performancing</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2005/12/22/its-not-flock-vs-performancing/#comment-1291593</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Performancing is a nice add-in, Flock's pretty nice too. For a *much* more advanced blog editor, check out RocketPost:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.anconia.com/rocketpost" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.anconia.com/rocketpost"&gt;http://www.anconia.com/rock...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;(I designed it.)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It supports built-in photo editing, auto links to related posts, Technorati/Delicious tags, AutoCorrect, and lots more.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Manish</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2005 10:06:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: It&amp;#8217;s not Flock vs. Performancing</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2005/12/22/its-not-flock-vs-performancing/#comment-1291589</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Mark:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I know what you mean -- I was disappointed too.  But at the same time, I did like the Flickr integration and a couple of other things Flock had.  Could those all be handled with extensions to Firefox?  Sure -- and that's what the success of Performancing's plug-in shows.  But I think it's a little early to say Flock is dead as an idea.  As Chris says in his comment, I think we're getting a little impatient.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Chris:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thanks for stopping by.  And I wasn't trying to suggest that you got Mike to respond in your defence -- I think he felt he had to because of some of the things that were being said, which is a shame.  It's one thing to say the Performancing extension is great, but that doesn't necessarily mean we should be giving Flock the last rites.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mathew</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2005 15:20:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: It&amp;#8217;s not Flock vs. Performancing</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2005/12/22/its-not-flock-vs-performancing/#comment-1291586</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hey Matt,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the feedback. I very much appreciate the rationality of your response -- and the point about folks becoming "binary" about these things is pretty spot on.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I didn't ask Mike to write his post or to come to our defense or anything -- I did point him to my post in a conversation that he and I were having last night and an hour later he said that I had "inspired" him (!).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;So I think the bigger point that he was responding to -- and which is why I think he continues to like Flock -- is that there is a bigger idea here and more at work in the way the web is changing that current thinking simply doesn't yet address. I'm working on Flock as a 10 year project; I'm working on Open Source as a 10 year project. Damn, the web has made us an impatient lot. Yeah, well, a little patience, a little hope and some elbow grease, yeh, that's what's gonna make this thing better and no longer just the neighborhood of the geeks. Well, that's what I'm hoping for anyway.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chris Messina</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2005 15:02:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: It&amp;#8217;s not Flock vs. Performancing</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2005/12/22/its-not-flock-vs-performancing/#comment-1291584</link><description>&lt;p&gt;mathew,&lt;br&gt;i've tried flock and came away disappointed because it came too early and i don't see how it's going to be different enough from IE, opera and firefox to carve out a niche. i think what the performancing extension demonstrates is flock's lack of raison d'etre. if flock's biggest sizzle can be defused so easily, then what's the appeal?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;mark&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mark Evans</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2005 14:39:39 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>