<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Mathew's comments - Latest Comments in It&amp;#8217;s better than good, it&amp;#8217;s Twitterific</title><link>http://mathewingram.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://mathewingram.disqus.com/it8217s_better_than_good_it8217s_twitterific_01/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 16 Dec 2007 09:34:48 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: It&amp;#8217;s better than good, it&amp;#8217;s Twitterific</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/12/11/its-better-than-good-its-twitterific/#comment-36959</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I also find it fascinating that my twitter profile ranks higher than my LinkedIn profile when I do an ego-surf on "mitch joel" in Google. There does seem to be a strong appetite for the content in twitter.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;My primary use to flick out there short snippets or insights that are not "Blog-worthy." I try not to post in twitter stuff I have in my other channels.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mitch Joel</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 16 Dec 2007 09:34:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: It&amp;#8217;s better than good, it&amp;#8217;s Twitterific</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/12/11/its-better-than-good-its-twitterific/#comment-32817</link><description>&lt;p&gt;A fair point, Joe.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;To be honest, I would have to say that my view of Twitter -- like my&lt;br&gt;view of blogs -- is that it's somewhere in that grey area between&lt;br&gt;marketing and conversation.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Do I want people to know about and read my new blog posts? Sure I do.&lt;br&gt;Do I want to have a conversation with them about those posts?&lt;br&gt;Definitely.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Like I said, my view continues to evolve. Thanks for the input.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mathewi</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 18:33:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: It&amp;#8217;s better than good, it&amp;#8217;s Twitterific</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/12/11/its-better-than-good-its-twitterific/#comment-32793</link><description>&lt;p&gt;So when do we get "Techmeme: Twitter Edition"?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">webomatica</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 18:10:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: It&amp;#8217;s better than good, it&amp;#8217;s Twitterific</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/12/11/its-better-than-good-its-twitterific/#comment-32770</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Mathew, I personally view Twitter as a vehicle for conversation with the people whose ideas and blogs I find interesting. And this is reflected in the fact that I follow about 80% of the people who follow me.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;This isn't a criticism, just an observation. The fact that you follow only 1 in 10 of the people who follow you suggests that you have a different view of Twitter. Combine that with the fact that you tweet about every one of your blog posts and it raises the question: Do you view it primarily as a promotional vehicle - another way to attract attention and promote traffic to your blog?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I'm not suggesting that there is anything wrong with that. But I think that if you look at the follower/following ratio, it's a quick giveaway of whether people see Twitter as conversation or marketing.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Just a thought. :-)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">thornley</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 17:52:45 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>