<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Mathew's comments - Latest Comments in Is there a perfect kind of conference?</title><link>http://mathewingram.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://mathewingram.disqus.com/is_there_a_perfect_kind_of_conference/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2007 14:18:12 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Is there a perfect kind of conference?</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/04/21/is-there-a-perfect-kind-of-conference/#comment-1293545</link><description>&lt;p&gt;mexico pharmacy &lt;a href="http://pharm123.free-bb.com/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://pharm123.free-bb.com/"&gt;mexico pharmacy&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mexico pharmacy</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2007 14:18:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is there a perfect kind of conference?</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/04/21/is-there-a-perfect-kind-of-conference/#comment-1293543</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Coffee and WIFI.  You can dispense with one or the other but having either is a nice touch.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I agree that PPT is over rated.  Last presentation I gave  I had a set of PPT slides ready but .. they were talking points for the talk.  Which is a _good_ thing because the overhead was missing so I made do without.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The talk degenerated  (or evolved) into a nice bull session.  We would have been there for hours (fen will talk anything to death) but the room was booked after our session.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Brian Dunbar</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 21 Apr 2006 23:01:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is there a perfect kind of conference?</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/04/21/is-there-a-perfect-kind-of-conference/#comment-1293540</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Stu : The &lt;a href="http://stuart.blogware.com/blog/_archives/2006/4/21/1901817.html" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://stuart.blogware.com/blog/_archives/2006/4/21/1901817.html"&gt; trackback &lt;/a&gt;is not working on Evans site too..&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Matt : PPT was the the main meta "attention"engine of the late 90's na early 20's. But now particpants don't need lipservirce rather a discourse.  IMHO, the market is the discourse. without it there is nothing.. I once Asked Tom Peters what he thougth of slides vs non slides and he sez, he prefers throwing only a couple of words on a slide that lead the way for thought provocation which then permits him to infuse conversations and create a two way path. His first Expereince of this type was in one of his fame conferences of Brazil where his 1 hr slot become a 3 hr slot, because the people where asking questions. albiet to the annoyance of the organizers.. but he is tom peters and at 40K a pop, he can do what he wants..&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;But the point is simple. The world is getter smarter --ppts just dont cut it anymore !!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">/pd</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 21 Apr 2006 16:25:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is there a perfect kind of conference?</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/04/21/is-there-a-perfect-kind-of-conference/#comment-1293538</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Can't get the trackback to "take" so here's my bit: &lt;a href="http://stuart.blogware.com/blog/_archives/2006/4/21/1901852.html" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://stuart.blogware.com/blog/_archives/2006/4/21/1901852.html"&gt;http://stuart.blogware.com/...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;- Stuart&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Stuart MacDonald</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 21 Apr 2006 16:14:19 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>