-
Website
http://www.mathewingram.com/work -
Original page
http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/10/23/is-stumbleupon-better-than-google/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
scrawledinwax
23 comments · 1 points
-
webomatica
35 comments · 5 points
-
howardlindzon
46 comments · 69 points
-
JoeDuck
57 comments · 1 points
-
Karoli
32 comments · 39 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
In defence of newspapers and serendipity
2 weeks ago · 43 comments
-
Are independent bloggers an endangered species?
2 weeks ago · 8 comments
-
Bloggers, trust, MSM and correction fluid
1 week ago · 1 comment
-
Video: My panel with Shirky and Keen
1 month ago · 2 comments
-
Why media outlets want Facebook Connect
2 weeks ago · 1 comment
-
In defence of newspapers and serendipity
That being said, folks building Mahalo pages use delicious and stumble upon all the time to find interesting links to include on our pages. I think social bookmarking and editorial search do overlap in terms of themes, but just not for end users.
best j
I think this is one of the few times where Google dropped the ball on the potential of a new service...
Jason: Last time I checked, Mahalo was a social search site. Seems to me that the 3.7 million users of stumbleupon would be your core group of users. And, frankly, you can throw out the bottom 50% of users as they're going to use whatever search engine is convenient. e.g. Google.
Mathew: we may not be the average web user, but those like us usually make or break many of these companies.