<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Mathew's comments - Latest Comments in Is PaidContent really a &amp;#8220;blog&amp;#8221; at all?</title><link>http://mathewingram.disqus.com/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 23:17:02 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Is PaidContent really a &amp;#8220;blog&amp;#8221; at all?</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/03/28/is-paidcontent-really-a-blog-at-all/#comment-278991</link><description>Whoa, K. -- chill out, dude.  I just said I didn't find it that&lt;br&gt;interesting.  I didn't say it wasn't informative, and if you read the&lt;br&gt;whole thing you can see that I think highly of Rafat and what he's&lt;br&gt;been able to accomplish.  I fail to see how any of that makes me an&lt;br&gt;"Arrington fanboy."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 11:07 PM, Disqus</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mathewi</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 23:17:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is PaidContent really a &amp;#8220;blog&amp;#8221; at all?</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/03/28/is-paidcontent-really-a-blog-at-all/#comment-278971</link><description>"But I also find that &lt;a href="http://PaidContent.org" rel="nofollow"&gt;PaidContent.org&lt;/a&gt; isn’t that… well, interesting..."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;oh puh-leez. if that were a description of this blog, we'd be in full agreement. but it's so wrong and simply a smear.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;i suppose if you enjoy a website where its writers call other people "wanker" and "cun*," then you know where to click. but rafat and his team have built a web site that's both informative and engaging. if you find it less than thrilling, that's your problem. but your snark is ill-considered, silly and cheap. then again, i don't expect any less from a arrington fanboy.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">K. Shaheedin</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 23:06:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is PaidContent really a &amp;#8220;blog&amp;#8221; at all?</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/03/28/is-paidcontent-really-a-blog-at-all/#comment-278965</link><description>Thanks, Steve -- I think you are right.  PC is using the blog format&lt;br&gt;and blog tools to deliver something that (apart from comments) is far&lt;br&gt;more like traditional media, and that is what makes it even more of a&lt;br&gt;threat to that same traditional media than what most people think of&lt;br&gt;when they hear the word "blog."  I'd still much rather read TechCrunch&lt;br&gt;or Gawker though  :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 10:54 PM, Disqus</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mathewi</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 22:59:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is PaidContent really a &amp;#8220;blog&amp;#8221; at all?</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/03/28/is-paidcontent-really-a-blog-at-all/#comment-278955</link><description>Well, here we have the interesting question of "what's a blog?" followed by the more interesting "does it really matter, anyway?" PC is a blog, insofar as it constantly updates itself in the blog format, invites comments, has trackbacks and other features bloggy. So I don't see arguing that it's not a blog, simply because it lacks opinion.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;However, I think the more interesting debate is "What's a blog?" and "What does it matter?" PC uses the blog format... to deliver news. Unlike most blogs, it doesn't use news as a starting point for discussion. More news websites should be like this - they should feature a constant river of information as it happens, rather than waiting to post a finished product.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It's my guess that MSM will adopt blog style more and more.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Good one, Matthew.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve Safran</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 22:53:13 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>