Community Page
- www.mathewingram.com/work Jump to website »
-
Subscribe -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
Popular Threads
-
Recent Comments
- I look forward to seing the outcome at the end of this.
- The internet is shaping and evolving so fast, but people take a long time to change their ways.
- life is just so fragile, we shoud never take it for granted.
- It is very sad, I have a freind who is dying of cancer. She however can do nothing much except sleep at the moment.
- Hi Mathew, I'm glad you finally got an iPhone. I remember you mentioning you wanted one but had a Blackberry for work. I'm a big fan of the Panorama application... and Bejeweled 2.
Jump to original thread »
The arcane system by which songwriters, publishers and other rights-holders get compensated when their music is played on the radio in the United States is complicated enough, with quasi-governmental bodies that decide how many pennies each instance will cost, and so on. But at least the fees
... Continue reading »
10 months ago
10 months ago
The next station will do exactly that, the case will move forward, and the ultimate verdict will be that creative commons licensing eliminates royalties and the RIAA/MPAA/ASCAP/BMI/SESAC and all the rest, will be left wondering why they spent so much money on a lost cause. Better they would have invested that money to compete and reorganize to serve their industry.
10 months ago
10 months ago
9 months ago
1 day ago
Internet radio allows very niche services to operate and be listened to by the world - allowing undiscovered/little played music to be given the exposure it wouldn't normally get from the large groups who operate vast numbers of FM radio stations.
Why not link internet radio royalties to revenue, much like the FM stations do, rather than on a "pay per play" basis?