<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Mathew's comments - Latest Comments in Is Google getting serious about mobile&amp;#63;</title><link>http://mathewingram.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://mathewingram.disqus.com/is_google_getting_serious_about_mobile63/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2007 18:09:36 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Is Google getting serious about mobile&amp;#63;</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/06/25/is-google-getting-serious-about-mobile/#comment-1314881</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yes, you asked some very interesting questions . I asked myself something similar.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt; I had hoped Google will get more involved with Apple into mobility project.&lt;br&gt; I was very wrong.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt; Still, to me, it is unclear the nature of Google Apple partnership.&lt;br&gt;From the business perspective and acquisitioins, It could be like ''or'' suggested.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;But Google bought Neven Vision which had a iScout project fully developed at that time.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt; To me, if Google plans to enter mobile biz then they will somehow use it in their advantage. I hoped it will be integrated into iPhone. It wasn't.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Mobile software like iScout could really change mobile advertising ( combination of Maps and Local APIs ). So, I really don't know how Google plans to roll out mobile strategy in the future.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I know Micheal Jones and John Hanke spoke much last months about Google plans with Maps and Earth product portfoilo. Jones even said ''iphone is tri-corder of our times''.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Now we know, it is not.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;By the way, even though iPhone intriduced radical proposition for UI on mobile phones, some handset makers do see it like evolution ( not revolution ) and they are slowly introducing their models.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Just look at new Sony Ericsson W960i. It's in the same product range like iPhone and N95.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It's very nice designed, touchscreen, multimedia and a tons of power that iPhone lacks.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Just some thoughts.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I really do wait time when I'll walk with phone in my hand, pointing camera on the phone into buliding and getting scanned enviroment ( connecting physical and virtual realm )&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Nokia the other day introduce ( concept ) point&amp;amp;find. That's exactly how search should be done on mobile phone. With camera as an option, not only textual search.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The next year will be doable, i guess&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.redherring.com/Article.aspx?a=22740" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.redherring.com/Article.aspx?a=22740"&gt;http://www.redherring.com/A...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Zec</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2007 18:09:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is Google getting serious about mobile&amp;#63;</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/06/25/is-google-getting-serious-about-mobile/#comment-1314879</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Google has appeared to be stretched thin for sometime, both in terms of updating their core products, and making use of acquisitions. I wouldn't think a buy of this type signals anything more than a speculative hedge buy on Google's part. JMHO.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">rod / techfold.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2007 17:36:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is Google getting serious about mobile&amp;#63;</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/06/25/is-google-getting-serious-about-mobile/#comment-1314878</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Or, that's a fair point.  Thanks for making it.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mathew</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2007 17:22:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is Google getting serious about mobile&amp;#63;</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/06/25/is-google-getting-serious-about-mobile/#comment-1314880</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Exactly how do you think google maps for mobile, plus gmail app was produced (and don't forget Goog-411).  Obviously those acquisitions had something to do with those (excluding Dodgeball).  Also I think the android and reqwireless acquisitions was just part of completing their mobile department.  I never understood why the blogosphere believes that every acquisition must lead to a direct product, sometimes it's just the absorption of technology, and human resources into current development.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">or</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2007 15:48:43 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>