DISQUS

Mathew's comments: Is Google flirting with the e-word?

  • Ryan Coleman · 3 years ago
    I can sort of understand the uneasy factor about this type of solution. I personally go back and forth. I guess, as long as it's tied to my PC only, and used to serve me ads that I'm more likely to be interested in I don't have an issue.

    If, however, I search "Volvo" one week and then the next get piled with physical junk mail at home from Volvo because Google has tied my PC w/my Google account (which has my address through my AdSense profile) Then yeah - over the line.
  • Peter Cranstone · 3 years ago
    Hi Mathew,

    Great post… the search engines want to solve the relevance problem. Ultimately there is really only one way to do that, know more about the person i.e. me. Their current approach is cookies which as you say looks over my shoulder and reports back to the mother ship. You then correctly state the fear, is that I have NO choice in the matter.

    So parsing that further the problem it then becomes, how do I not only make ads more relevant AND allow my customer base to opt-in or out as they desire?

    What if I allowed Google to know more about me every time I did a search and I also allowed Volvo (because I like Volvo’s) to know more about me. My name, address and phone number is all public information. I’m willing to share it with them as long as they don’t abuse my privacy. What I want in return is “relevant, pin-point targeting adverts” which tell me about Volvo’s. AND (this is critical) I want those ads to be localized to a region no more than 10 miles from where I live. Finally I want to be able to opt-in at my leisure.

    So lets list the problems that the search engines currently have…

    • They don’t know much about me (my interests)
    • They don’t know where I live
    • They have know idea how to connect local business advertisers to my interests and location
    • They don’t know how offer me all of the above in real time when I log on with my mobile device while traveling (say I’m in San Francisco and a dealer there is running a special on Volvo’s)

    Finally if they knew all of the above the ads would become so targeted and so relevant that I’m almost compelled to click on them – especially if there is some additional temptation i.e. discount/coupon. Also if they (Google and Volvo) knew where I was when I clicked on those ads it would reduce click fraud.

    I don’t mind ads, I don’t mind sharing my personal data, what I hate is ads that are not relevant and someone abusing my privacy. After all I share my credit card info every time I buy something, when someone abuses that I show my displeasure by not going there anymore. That’s why I never click on any ads…. It’s because they are never relevant to me or where I live.

    All the best,


    Peter
  • Mathew Ingram · 3 years ago
    Thanks for the comments, Ryan and Peter. I think you both touched on the hard part, which is using personal information to make ads more relevant but without crossing a line and abusing people's privacy. That's the Holy Grail.
  • JimCanuck · 3 years ago
    What would worry me more would be if, having looked at a Volvo web page and been "cookied", and then Google figured out an algorithm to track every other vehicle manufacturer whose page I visited. Would be a gold mine of competitive information that any vendor would lust for. However, that would be a definite invasion of privacy.

    As an aside, having been a Volvo owner since 1972, I don't think there is much Volvo could learn about me by tracking me on the Internet.
  • free RAZR cell phone · 3 years ago
    i got a free razr from this website and thought i would share :-)