<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Mathew's comments - Latest Comments in Is ArmchairGM the future of blogs?</title><link>http://mathewingram.disqus.com/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 21:17:12 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Is ArmchairGM the future of blogs?</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/11/30/is-armchairgm-the-future-of-blogs/#comment-23307</link><description>I'll put my sports blogger hat on for a minute and say that I've visited ArmchairGM before, but it was a while back when the look and feel of the site was uninviting, so I didn't go back until just now, and it seems to have improved some. It's been around a while, though.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chris Clarke</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 21:17:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is ArmchairGM the future of blogs?</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/11/30/is-armchairgm-the-future-of-blogs/#comment-23229</link><description>I'm glad to come across someone who actually uses it.  What do you&lt;br&gt;like about it?  It seems to have a fairly high level of participation,&lt;br&gt;which is something not all Web 2.0 sites have, for a variety of&lt;br&gt;reasons.  Is it just because sports is something people feel&lt;br&gt;passionate about?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mathewi</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 20:05:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is ArmchairGM the future of blogs?</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/11/30/is-armchairgm-the-future-of-blogs/#comment-23225</link><description>It's a great site, I've been using it for a while - has quite the loyal following (at least if nominations for the Open Web Awards are any indication).</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">parislemon</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 20:02:19 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>