<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Mathew's comments - Latest Comments in I think YouTube&amp;#8217;s valuation is irrelevant</title><link>http://mathewingram.disqus.com/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 01 Oct 2006 20:22:20 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: I think YouTube&amp;#8217;s valuation is irrelevant</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/10/01/i-think-youtubes-valuation-is-irrelevant/#comment-1296373</link><description>Of course you  and everyone else cares about which valuation model is correct for youtube.   The current debate is about how deal with the obvious copyright liability. But unlike pure audio, many of these videos have the ads in them and so the holder of the copyright is unlikely to complain too much.  Now if the copyright holders can track the behaviour of individuals who view their content, well maybe there is a tradeoff in the making.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">michael webster</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 01 Oct 2006 20:22:20 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>