Community Page
- www.mathewingram.com/work Jump to website »
-
Subscribe -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
Popular Threads
-
Recent Comments
- What a useful post here. Very informative for me..TQ friends... Cheers, <a href="http://sain-web.com" rel="nofollow">Buat Duit Dengan Blog</a>
- "1. Just because the New York Times does something doesn't make it right. 2. Describing something as a rumour, or putting it in the form of a question, doesn't make it OK to...
- Thanks a lot for sharing
- I think this is the dangerous trend we are on that the media only tells people what it wants and attempts to manipulate than allow people to make up their own mines
- It would be nice if we all made our own clothes out of hemp fiber, and used wind power to generate all of our energy, and so on. But that probably isn’t going to happen any time soon either.
Jump to original thread »
Henry Blodget of Silicon Alley Insider says that he has heard rumours of at least one and possibly two other bidders who had offers all ready to go for Yahoo before Microsoft jumped in and spoiled the party, and Paul Kedrosky says he has also heard such talk — supposedly private equity
... Continue reading »
1 year ago
If anything it seems the other way around. They both have search, mail, finance, etc.
They duplicate each other in so many ways. Would both brands, MSN and Yahoo survive?
Imagine all the time they'd spend internally arguing about which way to go -- collapse two brands into one or have two brands going forward.
In the end the Yahoo brand will disappear, it always goes that way, and then what did Microsft pay all the money for?
I don't think you've made your case. Imho.
1 year ago
1 year ago
That was at the stocks 4 yr low price...
The stocks 52 week high was 34 and was trading at 31 just 3 months ago. It was pummelled with the market and Jerry Yang's poor CC performance.. but the "62% premium" makes a nice headline.. but I dont think the price is outrageous. Being a longterm shareholder I would hold out for more.. and/or outsource search to Google and attempt to stay indepedent.
1 year ago
Say it ain't so!!!!
1 year ago
Most mergers of this sort actually do not increase shareholder wealth. They are often a sign that management is floundering to define direction. However, I don't believe that is the case with MSFT. They have desperately been trying to build community and Web services (yes for ad revenue, but also for extending their platform). I think it is safe to say that they have not done a very good job at it. So, buying Yahoo! makes a ton of sense in my opinion. It is not a diversion or a company desperately looking to 'jump on board" (hrm .. AOL/TIME).
Just as Google dropped it's video platform to buy YouTube, MSFT dropping MSN to buy Yahoo makes sense.