<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Mathew's comments - Latest Comments in I think Mike and Om should get hitched</title><link>http://mathewingram.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://mathewingram.disqus.com/i_think_mike_and_om_should_get_hitched/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Nov 2006 09:46:36 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: I think Mike and Om should get hitched</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/11/06/i-think-mike-and-om-should-get-hitched/#comment-1301337</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I would agree, John.  I was kind of using "micro-niche" as a synonym for "smaller than Time Warner"...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mathew Ingram</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 07 Nov 2006 09:46:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I think Mike and Om should get hitched</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/11/06/i-think-mike-and-om-should-get-hitched/#comment-1301333</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Interesting.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;And while I don't think you quite meant it that way, I don't view either TechCrunch or the Om empire as "micro-niche."&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Depends on your perspective, I guess.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">johnkoetsier</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 07 Nov 2006 01:20:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I think Mike and Om should get hitched</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/11/06/i-think-mike-and-om-should-get-hitched/#comment-1301331</link><description>&lt;p&gt;great idea.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">howardlindzon</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 06 Nov 2006 23:57:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I think Mike and Om should get hitched</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/11/06/i-think-mike-and-om-should-get-hitched/#comment-1301329</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Interesting Post .. would you like to &lt;a href="http://peterdawson.typepad.com/blog/2006/08/who_is_better_m.html" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://peterdawson.typepad.com/blog/2006/08/who_is_better_m.html"&gt;Comment&lt;/a&gt; ???&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">/pd</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 06 Nov 2006 20:49:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I think Mike and Om should get hitched</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/11/06/i-think-mike-and-om-should-get-hitched/#comment-1301327</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Good one, Aidan.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;And no, Anuvinder, I don't really think it would make TechCrunch and gigaom more like an old media publication -- I think they would still have the same flavour they have now, they would just have a bit more mass when it came to attracting advertising, which I think is the hardest thing about being a micro-niche publication, online or off.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mathew Ingram</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 06 Nov 2006 16:30:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I think Mike and Om should get hitched</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/11/06/i-think-mike-and-om-should-get-hitched/#comment-1301325</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Interesting you say this Mathew, because a while ago when both Mike and Om were about to launch their respective job boards, Mike wanted to join forces with Om, though just for the job board (&lt;a href="http://www.crunchnotes.com/?p=263)" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.crunchnotes.com/?p=263)"&gt;http://www.crunchnotes.com/...&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Your analysis makes sense....&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;But then, if they do something like this, what would this really do to the two blogs? Wouldn\'t that really transform techcrunch/gigaom into something like an old world pre-blog era publication? With lots of different sections and writers....And perhaps we\'ll all be back to reading Business 2.0 again!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Or maybe not.... :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anuvinder Singh</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 06 Nov 2006 15:23:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I think Mike and Om should get hitched</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/11/06/i-think-mike-and-om-should-get-hitched/#comment-1301323</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Do you think Mike would demand a pre-nup?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Aidan Henry</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 06 Nov 2006 15:20:30 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>