-
Top Commenters
-
Community
-
Popular Threads
-
Recent Comments
- I agree, Daniel. I think Nick's model makes a lot of sense, and for the most part it seems to be paying off -- and not just for him, but for lots of his bloggers as well.
- "If you're a blogger at an established site like Gawker, it's quite obvious that for every dollar you make in bonus pay, Denton has made much more in terms of extra advertising revenue. You really earned ...
- I stupidly didn't even check to see if you had written anything on it, Felix -- I should have known that you would have. And an excellent analysis of the situation it is. As you note, some of the ...
- Hi Matthew -- I take it you've seen my latest <a href="http://www.portfolio.com/views/blogs/market-movers/2008/07/03/blogonomics-gawkers-latest-pay-cut">2,500 words on the subject</a>, so I won't reprise ...
- "Thank you Matt for this important reminder. I sure hope I don't confuse these two bastions of journalistic integrity ever again." +1 to the Duck
Huge: Facebook, Plaxo and Google open up
6 comments
-
WhatsNext 5 months ago with 2 points
*******I THINK THIS IS BAD NEWS FOR NEW START-UPS.*******
If any system of which data of the user is shared across multiple sites, would the valuation of those sites using the shared information not be cut by at least 50%?
Lets take Facebook for example. I figure their multi-billion dollar valuation is for their ability to reach to millions, and the information they have about all of those users.
If then one company, lets take OpenSocial (google) has all that information, they are the true big-wigs.
So, for convenience, its great, but for the sites using it, it won’t be as valuable if their looking for an exit-strategy, right?
I’m not an economist here, so please let me know if I am way off, but thats how I see it going down. -
I'm not sure you're right, What's Next.
I don't think Facebook's valuation is based on the fact that it has
somehow trapped its users and all of their data inside its
walled-garden network -- otherwise known as the "roach motel" business
model. And if that is what it's valuation is based on, then much of it
will vanish.
I'd like to think that social networks rise or fall based on what they
can help you do, or how easy they make it to create a network of
friends, rather than how efficiently they lock you in -- although I
know there are some big companies who disagree on that. -
Although Data is very important to any social network, what you do with the data is the real essence of any service, and depending on users’ data for value is not a good business decision, as sooner or later users will move on to better social networks.
Plus, I don’t think social networks will open all of their data, just share some of it and allow its users to export them using certain yet-to-be-know standards. -
Matthew, Facebook isn't opening up and that's why I don't think this is huge news. All the announcement says is that the companies are agreeing to talk about best practices.
If Facebook were to open up, after working things out with other workgroup members, that would be huge news. -
I agree that it's not exactly opening up yet, Eldon -- but "talking
about opening up" wouldn't fit in the headline :-) And regardless, I
think it's noteworthy that a senior executive of Facebook is even
talking about best practices or agreeing on standards -- but you're
quite right that it is still early days. -
I love how Plaxo is getting put alongside Google in FB in all this press, good move for them I'd say.


