Community Page
- www.mathewingram.com/work Jump to website »
-
Subscribe -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
Popular Threads
-
Recent Comments
- What a useful post here. Very informative for me..TQ friends... Cheers, <a href="http://sain-web.com" rel="nofollow">Buat Duit Dengan Blog</a>
- "1. Just because the New York Times does something doesn't make it right. 2. Describing something as a rumour, or putting it in the form of a question, doesn't make it OK to...
- Thanks a lot for sharing
- I think this is the dangerous trend we are on that the media only tells people what it wants and attempts to manipulate than allow people to make up their own mines
- It would be nice if we all made our own clothes out of hemp fiber, and used wind power to generate all of our energy, and so on. But that probably isn’t going to happen any time soon either.
Jump to original thread »
It’s a classic small-town newspaper story: the big fire, with all the pumpers and ladder-trucks on the scene, the volunteer firefighters helping out, maybe even a building or two evacuated. Makes for great journalism of the old-fashioned kind (remind me to tell you about the ti
... Continue reading »
1 year ago
1 year ago
1 year ago
1 year ago
"This disaster will be twitterized" at http://mashable.com/2007/10/23/this-disaster-wi...
Since yesterday I can see at least 3 or 4 new twitter feeds dedicated to the fire, one of which is from the LA Times. Because twitter is something that can happen totally by text messaging, it lends itself well to on the scene disaster reporting. Because twitterers can also track info via their text messaging on thier phones, they can also access the aid information going out without even going on the Internet.
I really appreciated your point about Wikipedia as a news outlet in itself. Is this called wikijournalism, wikireporting, hmmm?
1 year ago
I kind of like "crowdsourcing," which my friend Jeff Howe at Wired magazine came up with, but Jeff Jarvis's "networked journalism" works pretty well too I think.