<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Mathew's comments - Latest Comments in How many does registration keep out?</title><link>http://mathewingram.disqus.com/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 30 Dec 2007 16:18:01 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: How many does registration keep out?</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/12/29/how-many-does-registration-keep-out/#comment-51612</link><description>Thanks for the comment, Lucas -- so you have a reg wall that only pops&lt;br&gt;up after a certain number of visits?  That's interesting.  A good&lt;br&gt;idea, I think.  It's possible that I have followed links to the LA&lt;br&gt;Times before and so tripped that wire without knowing it -- I know I&lt;br&gt;clicked through to the Lazarus piece several times over a period of&lt;br&gt;days, so maybe that did it.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mathewi</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 30 Dec 2007 16:18:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How many does registration keep out?</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/12/29/how-many-does-registration-keep-out/#comment-51575</link><description>I work in the Interactive section of the LA Times and the registration wall shouldn't go up on your first visit, instead your 8th or so.  I can't control the wall but I can at least find out why it happened like this.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">lucasjosh</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 30 Dec 2007 15:40:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How many does registration keep out?</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/12/29/how-many-does-registration-keep-out/#comment-51352</link><description>I totally agree with registration for comments, Karoli -- if you don't&lt;br&gt;give people at least a bit of a hurdle to clear, then there's a lot&lt;br&gt;more noise as opposed to signal.  But I'm not sure the registration&lt;br&gt;helps target people -- I assume the majority of people who fill them&lt;br&gt;out lie anyway.  Cookies and IP sniffing seem like they would work&lt;br&gt;just fine for advertising purposes, and they are unobtrusive.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mathewi</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 30 Dec 2007 04:48:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How many does registration keep out?</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/12/29/how-many-does-registration-keep-out/#comment-51350</link><description>Back when I worked for the CNN community, we started with no registration.  Anyone, anywhere could come to the site, read, and leave comments or debate the issues on the message boards.  That ended the night Princess Diana was killed.  For us, the question wasn't who would we keep out, but who SHOULD we  keep out?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Today things are a bit different.  The LA Times, NY Times registrations are intended to be tradeoffs -- you register, they track.  They track what you do and how you do it, and the tradeoff for you is reading their content free.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I think it's a dumb way to operate, but they absolutely do need a way to track visitors that will allow them to get targeted advertising or media buys at prime rates.  With the ongoing outcry over privacy, the best and safest way to gather those metrics is to force registration and subsequent logins.  Unfortunately.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The way it should work:  Register to leave comments.  No registration to read articles, but an interstitial ahead of the first article informing the user that cookies are used to track usage and interest.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Karoli</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 30 Dec 2007 04:41:27 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>