<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Mathew's comments - Latest Comments in Hey, we&amp;#8217;re big and we&amp;#8217;re blogging</title><link>http://mathewingram.disqus.com/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 14:41:32 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Hey, we&amp;#8217;re big and we&amp;#8217;re blogging</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/12/07/hey-were-big-and-were-blogging/#comment-29272</link><description>An argument could be made that publicly-traded companies do have some issues that privately-held ones don't have to worry about, but other than that, I think you're on the right track.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">lux</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 14:41:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hey, we&amp;#8217;re big and we&amp;#8217;re blogging</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/12/07/hey-were-big-and-were-blogging/#comment-28979</link><description>Honestly, I don't think the creation of a blogging council is going to make much difference at all. There will be lots of talk but little walk. For some companies, it makes sense to blog but many others are reluctant to make the leap because of concerns over competition, disclosure rules, etc.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mark Evans</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 09:50:05 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>