<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Mathew's comments - Latest Comments in Hey Dave &amp;#8212; you have to let go of RSS</title><link>http://mathewingram.disqus.com/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2006 19:52:42 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Hey Dave &amp;#8212; you have to let go of RSS</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/02/18/hey-dave-you-have-to-let-go-of-rss/#comment-1292679</link><description>RFC4287 is an IETF "proposed standard" - which is a first-class IETF standard (see &lt;a href="http://www.ietf.org/tao.html#6.4" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.ietf.org/tao.html#6.4&lt;/a&gt;).  It's done, cooked, ready to serve.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tim Bray</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2006 19:52:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hey Dave &amp;#8212; you have to let go of RSS</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/02/18/hey-dave-you-have-to-let-go-of-rss/#comment-1292677</link><description>further comments :)-  &lt;a href="http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc4287.txt" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc4287.txt&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I should have added the wg timelines too..&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Apr 2006    Request Last Call for Atom editing protocol  &lt;br&gt;May 2006    Submit Atom editing protocol to IESG for consideration as a Proposed Standard</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">/pd</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2006 23:03:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hey Dave &amp;#8212; you have to let go of RSS</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/02/18/hey-dave-you-have-to-let-go-of-rss/#comment-1292675</link><description>not sure if atom is a ietf standard. Its still draft status waiting iesg review.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">/pd</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2006 22:59:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hey Dave &amp;#8212; you have to let go of RSS</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/02/18/hey-dave-you-have-to-let-go-of-rss/#comment-1292673</link><description>If you look into RSS history you'll see that it is filled with political machinations with Dave Winer at the center.  The &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RSS_(file_format)" rel="nofollow"&gt;political nature of RSS&lt;/a&gt; motivated the creation of Atom, which addresses most issues with RSS via the &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IETF" rel="nofollow"&gt;Internet Engineering Task Force&lt;/a&gt;, an effor that was lead by Canadian &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tim_Bray" rel="nofollow"&gt;Tim Bray&lt;/a&gt; (who back in the 1990s led the development of XML.)  Dave Winer though has fought a battle against &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atom_(Standard)" rel="nofollow"&gt;Atom&lt;/a&gt; for reasons similar to why he is now fighting the RSS Advisory Board.  The need to keep himself central has also motivated Dave to attack those that try to spread the use of the format-neutral "web feed" terminology for RSS and Atom feeds.  Dave's attacks on Google started when Google adopted Atom &lt;a href="http://news.com.com/2100-1032-5157662.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt; and his attacks on Microsoft were motivated in part by that companies use of the term web feed &lt;a href="http://archive.scripting.com/2005/08/13#meanInternationalSoftwareMonopoly" rel="nofollow"&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ben Houston</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 19 Feb 2006 15:49:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hey Dave &amp;#8212; you have to let go of RSS</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/02/18/hey-dave-you-have-to-let-go-of-rss/#comment-1292671</link><description>Please take a look at Atom. Atom exists because Winer blocked early attempts at an open RSS standard. Now Atom is an IETF standard; RSS is merely de facto. Atom is more precise than RSS for current uses (it solves the funny characters problem). Atom is extensible in an orderly way; RSS is "simple" but limited. As syndication applications grow the good design and new features of Atom will prove it to be a more powerful solution.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rick Thomas</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 19 Feb 2006 10:49:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hey Dave &amp;#8212; you have to let go of RSS</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/02/18/hey-dave-you-have-to-let-go-of-rss/#comment-1292667</link><description>But it's not a democracy.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Paul Montgomery</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 19 Feb 2006 00:38:49 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>