http://mathewingram.disqus.com/enTue, 28 Oct 2008 15:38:26 -0000http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/10/28/google-start-up-those-book-scanners/#comment-3347982Interesting. I wasn't aware of such revenue plans prior to the initial objections of the publishers. Other than something obvious like contextual advertising.<br>Either-way, it adds another piece to the Google store front and away from ads, which I find interesting.Kurt GoodenTue, 28 Oct 2008 15:38:26 -0000http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/10/28/google-start-up-those-book-scanners/#comment-3346865I wonder if any of the writers will see a penny of that settlement?<br><br>/sarcasmVincentClementTue, 28 Oct 2008 14:45:14 -0000http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/10/28/google-start-up-those-book-scanners/#comment-3343471I'm not sure they got sued into it -- Google has been trying from the beginning to interest publishers in how the scanning project could generate revenue, presumably for both sides.mathewiTue, 28 Oct 2008 11:51:36 -0000http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/10/28/google-start-up-those-book-scanners/#comment-3343209Did Google just get sued INTO a new revenue model? (online book store, assuming they will take a cut)Kurt GoodenTue, 28 Oct 2008 11:37:41 -0000