<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Mathew's comments - Latest Comments in Google Pack &amp;#8212; colour me confused</title><link>http://mathewingram.disqus.com/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2006 11:48:09 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Google Pack &amp;#8212; colour me confused</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/01/05/google-pack-colour-me-confused/#comment-1291647</link><description>I know what you mean, Rod -- a lot of this stuff seems to be of the&lt;br&gt;"throw it at the wall and see what sticks" variety.  But then maybe&lt;br&gt;that's natural -- and as Sergey has said before, a lot of Google's&lt;br&gt;best ideas have come from that approach, so maybe we shouldn't knock&lt;br&gt;it  ;-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And I guess you're right about it being noise to a large extent, Stuart.&lt;br&gt;After all, distributing the Google Pack isn't going to matter one way&lt;br&gt;or the other.  And I guess Google is allowed a few missteps along with&lt;br&gt;the rest. I suppose we all pay so much attention to each one just&lt;br&gt;because they are such a huge and dominant player, and we expect&lt;br&gt;everything they do to be a world-changing event.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mathew</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2006 11:48:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Pack &amp;#8212; colour me confused</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/01/05/google-pack-colour-me-confused/#comment-1291645</link><description>I said my piece over on Mark's blog (which I am not sure how the link to -- the link isn't showing up, but in any case I won't restate it here). Basic gist is that this is all super-dee-duper, but when all is said and done GYM+aol's future share price has everything to do with how well they are positioned to soak up the future wave of re-directed ad spend (which just better show up, too), and this stuff is just noise.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I also agree with Rod's comment above: GOOG is going through what all companies who have had that trajectory go through eventually (I've lived it myself). Massive growth leads to  massive hiring, massive success leads to  massive expectations, all set against the backdrop of an organization  dealing with cultural and organizational  maturation. It is tremendously hard to do. Maybe they are avoiding that pain, and if so great, but it's a huge challenge for any organization.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;- Stuart</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Stuart MacDonald</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2006 11:41:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Pack &amp;#8212; colour me confused</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/01/05/google-pack-colour-me-confused/#comment-1291643</link><description>Google really seems to be floundering without any strategic focus. Too many diversified agendas in a period of extreme growth with ready access to lots of cash seems like a recipe for debilitating "strategic drift." I mean, come on, instead of rebranding freeware, use some resources to take gmail out of beta.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;then again, maybe this is all smokescreen, and google will wow us again.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rod Edwards</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2006 03:19:24 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>