-
Website
http://www.mathewingram.com/work -
Original page
http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/01/31/google-misses-but-will-it-matter/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
scrawledinwax
23 comments · 1 points
-
webomatica
35 comments · 5 points
-
howardlindzon
46 comments · 69 points
-
JoeDuck
57 comments · 1 points
-
Karoli
32 comments · 39 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
In defence of newspapers and serendipity
3 weeks ago · 43 comments
-
Are independent bloggers an endangered species?
2 weeks ago · 8 comments
-
Bloggers, trust, MSM and correction fluid
1 week ago · 2 comments
-
Why media outlets want Facebook Connect
2 weeks ago · 1 comment
-
First Read: Follow the Breadcrumbs : CJR
2 weeks ago · 1 comment
-
In defence of newspapers and serendipity
So you should apologise to the weasels. Being compared to stock analysts is a major insult.
http://internetstockblog.com/article/6351
As a google investor, would appreciate your take on this.
As I see it, Google is essentially saying that the difference in their tax rate accounts for the majority of the miss, and as far as I can tell they are right. Expenses actually fell as a percentage of revenue, which is good, and there was substantial revenue growth, which is also good. I think this is more evidence that analysts are having a hard time coming up with forecasts because they get so little guidance -- and apparently Google has said it will start providing more on the tax side at least.