<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Mathew's comments - Latest Comments in Google: Is it getting big and stodgy?</title><link>http://mathewingram.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://mathewingram.disqus.com/google_is_it_getting_big_and_stodgy_61/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 21:56:41 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Google: Is it getting big and stodgy?</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/05/12/google-is-it-getting-big-and-stodgy/#comment-459929</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Next will be facebook getting old and stodgy. It's the cycle.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">antje wilsch</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 21:56:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google: Is it getting big and stodgy?</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/05/12/google-is-it-getting-big-and-stodgy/#comment-454411</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Maybe it's time to split the company up?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Vincent Clement</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 00:05:36 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>