-
Website
http://www.mathewingram.com/work -
Original page
http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/06/24/google-brings-the-hurt-to-comscore/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
StevenHodson
37 comments · 66 points
-
webomatica
35 comments · 5 points
-
howardlindzon
46 comments · 71 points
-
JoeDuck
57 comments · 1 points
-
Karoli
32 comments · 44 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
Daily Mirror editor says to forget about SEO
3 weeks ago · 4 comments
-
The Dallas Morning News pulls down the wall
2 weeks ago · 2 comments
-
Peabody Hotel, Memphis
3 weeks ago · 2 comments
-
Video of my TEDx Toronto talk
3 weeks ago · 2 comments
-
Go ahead: Ask me a question
2 weeks ago · 1 comment
-
Daily Mirror editor says to forget about SEO
Besides, I'll bet that Google does a better job than comScore and Compete--their results were often utter bollocks.
for instance:
if i'm an e-commerce Web site owner, and i sign up for free analytics, i can put a price on my traffic, based on conversions. when traffic has a price, i'm now more likely to try to buy traffic using AdWords
the more blogs there are in the world (blogger.com), the more content needs to be indexed and the more competition there is around key words. now as a marketer, in order to ensure i'm top of the pile when it comes to people searching for my key terms, i buy them.
similarly, the more marketers know about the Web, and its metric driven effectiveness, the more they will spend on AdWords to attract new users and new customers.
ed
It's not just the fact that Google *can* offer things for free, but
also that offering those things produces demand for other things
(namely advertising) that the company makes money on. In a lot of
ways, it's an example of Mike Masnick's "economics of abundance"
theory -- give away the things that are abundant and free (or can be
made abundant and free), and use that to drive demand for things that
aren't.
I'm noticing issues with google analytics NOT matching my own database data (google analytics has worse numbers). So they're going to share this crap data with others??
that they won't share that data with any personal info attached, and
it is all aggregated and whatnot -- but generally speaking, yes, I
think that's the idea.
I was afraid they were going to make this mandatory... good