<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Mathew's comments - Latest Comments in Google&amp;#8217;s Chrome is great, but&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://mathewingram.disqus.com/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 06:51:24 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Google&amp;#8217;s Chrome is great, but&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/09/02/googles-chrome-is-great-but/#comment-3166843</link><description>Hey Now Mathew,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Here is my post on Chrome &lt;a href="http://chriscatto.blogspot.com/2008/09/browsers-google-chrome.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://chriscatto.blogspot.com/2008/09/browsers...&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thx,&lt;br&gt;Catto</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Catto</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 06:51:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google&amp;#8217;s Chrome is great, but&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/09/02/googles-chrome-is-great-but/#comment-2112909</link><description>Totally agree, Jason.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mathewi</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 15:18:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google&amp;#8217;s Chrome is great, but&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/09/02/googles-chrome-is-great-but/#comment-2111794</link><description>Yeah, but these comments all miss the main point... it's a rock-solid browser for running Web apps.  If you haven't run into IE and FireFox's limitations in the scalability area you don't use Web apps as much as I do.  I don't care if somebody could make FireFox look exactly like Chrome, what they've done under the hood is reason enough to switch, for me at least.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jasonkolb</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 15:01:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google&amp;#8217;s Chrome is great, but&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/09/02/googles-chrome-is-great-but/#comment-2107443</link><description>That's funny -- I was just thinking the same thing myself earlier&lt;br&gt;today. That and my Shareaholic plugin.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mathewi</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 11:39:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google&amp;#8217;s Chrome is great, but&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/09/02/googles-chrome-is-great-but/#comment-2105690</link><description>i've been using Chrome for about a day now and it seems to be a lot faster than FireFox or IE... though i do miss the "recently closed tabs" feature in Firefox</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">movie buff</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 10:39:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google&amp;#8217;s Chrome is great, but&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/09/02/googles-chrome-is-great-but/#comment-2032267</link><description>I actually use IE7 a lot because I'm an aesthetic junkie and sites simply look nicer on IE7. However, it crashes a lot and thus I usually have FF open at the same time.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Two things on FF though that are a godsend: firebug and adblocker. Will never give up FF for those 2 reasons alone.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">antje</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 13:21:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google&amp;#8217;s Chrome is great, but&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/09/02/googles-chrome-is-great-but/#comment-2024840</link><description>Thanks for the round-up, Mathew. I'm too busy playing with this thing to find news about it :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">microrahsheen</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 21:37:44 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>