<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Mathew's comments - Latest Comments in Gary Vaynerchuk vs. Howard Stern</title><link>http://mathewingram.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://mathewingram.disqus.com/gary_vaynerchuk_vs_howard_stern/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2009 20:59:35 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Gary Vaynerchuk vs. Howard Stern</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/11/06/gary-vaynerchuk-vs-howard-stern/#comment-5252996</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Stern is all about the shock and awe ... this could have been his way to drum up a lot of negative attention. It wouldn't be the first time he's done that ;-)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;... Scott&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Scott Prock</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2009 20:59:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Gary Vaynerchuk vs. Howard Stern</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/11/06/gary-vaynerchuk-vs-howard-stern/#comment-3678954</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Don't listen to the hater!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mauricio Pina</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 10:16:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Gary Vaynerchuk vs. Howard Stern</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/11/06/gary-vaynerchuk-vs-howard-stern/#comment-3579709</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the comment, Fraser.  Updated the post with your link.  You make a pretty good case.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mathewi</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 20:31:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Gary Vaynerchuk vs. Howard Stern</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/11/06/gary-vaynerchuk-vs-howard-stern/#comment-3577233</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Gary's wrong. Facebook, Twitter, Myspace.... they aren't strategies. They're simple tools that can be leveraged to fulfill a strategy.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The classic story of Web 2.0 success has been: 1) scale attention and engagement; 2) back into a business model.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In this sense you can call Stern the King of All (New) Media.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;He's been using so-called new media tools - user-generated content, microchunking, focusing on the long-tail, ... - for decades (here's a blog post on this &lt;a href="http://bit.ly/tFzx" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://bit.ly/tFzx"&gt;http://bit.ly/tFzx&lt;/a&gt; ).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;He's aggregated up an insane amount of attention and engagement and has found a business model that doesn't rely on shilling t-shirts (Stern listeners will be familiar with his constant flaming of stars who monetize their audience through the hawking of shirts and other knick-knacks).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;He's killing it.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Fraser</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 17:48:17 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>