http://mathewingram.disqus.com/enMon, 28 Jan 2008 21:19:03 -0000http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/01/27/facebook-wants-to-be-the-web-os/#comment-107980<p>That's a good point, Leigh.</p>mathewiMon, 28 Jan 2008 21:19:03 -0000http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/01/27/facebook-wants-to-be-the-web-os/#comment-107973<p>Parakey anyone? Blake Ross anyone?<br>Facebook bought them and they've been MIA. However, if we read the parakey stuff from Ross that's exactly what he was saying Parakey was going to be.</p><p>...things that make you go hum......<br></p>leighMon, 28 Jan 2008 21:12:48 -0000http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/01/27/facebook-wants-to-be-the-web-os/#comment-104694<p>Sorry about that :-)</p>mathewiSun, 27 Jan 2008 12:56:02 -0000http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/01/27/facebook-wants-to-be-the-web-os/#comment-104684<p>oh no, you didn't just say social graph.......................................... :)</p>antje wilschSun, 27 Jan 2008 12:49:37 -0000http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/01/27/facebook-wants-to-be-the-web-os/#comment-104178<p>Developing on facebook gives you access to its users and means of viral marketing, but if you're building for the web, you might as well do it on your own.</p><p>And even the type of apps that are developed for facebook may not hold its worth on the web.</p>drBaherSun, 27 Jan 2008 01:03:01 -0000