Community Page
- www.mathewingram.com/work Jump to website »
-
Subscribe -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
Popular Threads
-
Recent Comments
- "1. Just because the New York Times does something doesn't make it right. 2. Describing something as a rumour, or putting it in the form of a question, doesn't make it OK to...
- Thanks a lot for sharing
- I think this is the dangerous trend we are on that the media only tells people what it wants and attempts to manipulate than allow people to make up their own mines
- It would be nice if we all made our own clothes out of hemp fiber, and used wind power to generate all of our energy, and so on. But that probably isn’t going to happen any time soon either.
- dsfasdfsf
Jump to original thread »
Like Hank Williams (no, not *that* Hank Williams) I too am fascinated by all of the recent talk in the blogosphere about how Twitter needs to be decentralized and/or disintermediated for the good of the Twitter-verse. In a post written for his own blog (creatively titled “W
... Continue reading »
1 year ago
Disintermediation of twitter or something twitter-like is innevitable. I am more loyal to Twhirl than I ever was to twitter and if twhirl operated the same way on a different protocol, I couldn't care less. The role that twitter plays in my life could very easily be snapped up by another (open-source or just more reliable) infrastructure.
1 year ago
addicted) to the function rather than the actual service or protocol,
Doug -- I would probably also be happy with just about anything that
replicated the functionality, which isn't really rocket surgery by any
means, just as I was happy to move from one IM client to another.
1 year ago
Cnstant social connectivity carries the illusion of desirability, but I think if one carefully reflects on the downtimes one finds they are no big deal. Twitter as a nice little gossip and microblog connection and important link alert? Sure. Twitter as essential communications tool? Nope. Get a life!
1 year ago
I really like Twitter and have gone on record as saying I'd probably pay for a premium account. But too important to leave to one company?
That's akin to saying that Paypal's money-transfer service is too important to be left to that company. Or that search is too important to be left to Google.
Other money services have come & gone, and companies have tried (and will continue) to wrest search share from Google. Each of the services provided by those companies is vastly more important to the conduct of business on the Internet that Twitter.
If you want to build a Twitter companion service, build it. If you want to siphon off every single message from the public time-line for "safe-guarding"... um, ok, do it. Knock yourself out.
Just stop the silliness. Twitter is interesting & useful, but it is *not* a public utility.
1 year ago
say it with me now... I-R-C
1 year ago
1 year ago
For instance, in both IE and Firefox, when I put in http://www.mathewingram.com/work/page/4/ I see the same posts as when I put in http://www.mathewingram.com/work/ . The only difference is the presence of "Next Entries" link at the bottom of /page/4.
1 year ago
1 year ago